wuqs
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI
on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:43AM (#35424440)
first of all, it is pretty prepotent to deny someone else feelings straight out of the box. i am an artist and if someone would came with the same art-style i do on Blender with an industrial scale speed; with some text input that took 15 seconds to type and MY data is on it, it would feel like a rape.
and i do not think "i am too insignificant to make an impactful change in society" ... if everyone think(ed) like the quote, life probably would be worse?
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI
on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:17AM (#35423960)
i hate AI art trained on copyrighted data and beyond that is just love for making computers think and act like us!
wanna work for Getty and Disney? good... but having your IP ripped out of your own blog feels like being raped, by open-source software or not
Re:Ask HN: Tools to Learn Music Theory?
on Thursday March 23, 2023 @11:17AM (#35276166)
Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @11:07PM (#35163276)
greedy is to train ML models on copyrighted data of hundreds of thousands of people with far beyond the amount of power Disney have!
also how many people are responsible for stuff like ChatGPT... 300? getting the bulky of their trainning data on, again, how many people?
it seems the monopoly history is re-inventing itself, now with fancy computers replicating human behaviour