wmedrano
wmedrano on Hacker News
The tokens per second graph on AA seems practically worthless. Apparently Argon/Carbon run around 100tps, but in Opencode I'm getting <30tps which seems in line with openrouter.ai speeds as well.
Yeah, its pretty low. I get about 60tps with a specialized engine on Strix Halo that runs UD-IQ4_XS with MTP
I've enjoyed the tinkering and building projects as well. Unfortunately that and some cozy coding are relegated to hobbies instead of my job.
It feels even slower when you consider thinking traces and tool calls which are skimmable at best.
I have a Raspberry Pi running ForgeJo and Hermes where Hermes is also accessible through Discord.
I'm actually shocked by how many people seem to have max subscriptions.
Something about renting that much compute doesn't sit right with me so I stick with the $20 subs.
The model (at least on the settings I used) was not for interactive chatting. It was for longer running tasks.
Edit: my view is probably tainted by the fact that I only used it at work for work with Antigravity CLI
Any idea on how they get the pricing so efficient? Their artificialanalysis graph has them on par with GLM 5.3 but at less than 10% of the price despite being larger than GLM 5.3.
Ocalm also has 63bit integers in case you want other implementations in the wild.
Are there any Zed features you're going to miss? Is the AI notable?
I started getting a little more into ELisp after reading The Land of Lisp, though its probably a bit basic. If I were to try to get better at ELisp through reading books/docs, I'd look into Common Lisp material.
I'm excited for the user-lisp/ changes. It'll let me create custom lightweight packages and have them lazily loaded by just sprinkling ;;;###autoload over interactive commands and modes.
This particular crate (arrayref) seems pretty niche, but also doable in std now.
It lets you take a slice `&[T]` and return a slice with a known number of elements`&[T; N]`. tiny-skia was probably using this to get some SIMD optimizations.
As of Jan 2026, this seems to be in the standard library under slice::as_array https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.slice.html#method.as...
I had to chuckle at this pro
> Built-in Emacs editor
The built in editor is a one of my least favorite parts of Emacs. I'm in it for the customizability.
The hard to detect is the compilers technical reason for not doing the analysis. Maybe it will one day.
In practice, it's annoying to track if those small util functions become dead code.
Could be a good tradeoff for the flash model though. 3.5 -> 3.6 is a tiny bit cheaper and maybe faster?
artificialanalysis.ai has it going from 165 tps -> 304 tps. openrouter.ai needs more data but it has it going from ~100 tps -> ~150 tps, though at peak 3.5 has reached 156tps.
So.... What models have actually failed?
Where does the less than a third the price come from? From the provided benchmark suite, it came slightly under half.
I haven't notice any significant changes.
My Linux experience gets more polished every year. Last serious issue I remember is a AMD GPU kernel crash around 2022(?).
I feel like Android has always had its glitches. I can live with the current set, but each update has me nervous about the new set of bugs that will appear.
This is not surprising and perhaps one of the things I respect about it. Zig is pretty minimalist and I would prefer denying my pet features over becoming design by committee.
I'm a bit curious, what features could you not do without?
I think of Emacs as more of a lisp machine than text editor. I'm also not sure what an IDE has over Emacs. I have autocomplete, compiler checks, and run tests all within Emacs.
For general automation, my blog is built with Emacs Lisp.
If you don't pass an allocator param in Zig, then the function basically can't allocate.