whythismatters
whythismatters on Hacker News
Today I used Claude Desktop after not having used it for a while. It ran bash commands on my machine, like starting brew services etc. It did not have that capability before (I used to hook up some mcp to allow selective file editing), and nobody warned me that it currently has. Shady tactics, very invasive, freaked me out.
Same with their desktop app by the way, absolutely infuriating.
>To make this kind of research accessible, I’m open-sourcing the workflow I created for this investigation as a small toolkit, Antiquity, enabling anyone with a question and a coding agent to conduct similar historical archival investigations.
https://github.com/jessewaites/antiquity
My first impression is that things have improved. I encountered some "honesty" though :)
Great post, thank you! So, let's resolve ancient Near East chronology and determine an absolute date for the sack of Babylon?
I recently tried to revive my account after not having accessed it for a decade or so. They asked for my gov issued ID, to be processed by the Persona service. Um, hell no.
The juvenile nonchalance with which some Anthropic employees seem to be talking to their AI (wacky, sick, cook, ...) is truly bizarre.
The author mentions Angular in the comments as a personal blind spot
Don't worry, in its final reply the agent will always present one or two things "worth flagging" to keep you engaged
Funny! Not sure if it's a cultural thing, but I experienced this phenomenon with Indian and Portuguese guys, and while I'm sure they're just trying to be polite, it's annoying as hell. Just ask the damn question!
I'm not affiliated, and did not actually try it, but your comment reminded me of the juggler coding agent, discussed here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883305>Each conversation is a Yjs CRDT tree. It can branch into sub-threads (recursively), and you can drill down, backtrack, edit, undo/redo, and inspect everything: tool calls, approvals, and the raw context JSON going to the model, etc.
>What comes next is a new kind of product we’re developing: opt-in experiences built around individual artists, where artists can choose to participate and get paid when they do, and fans get new ways to connect with the artists they love.
Actual title of the article: "Muse Give Up Their Social Media Handle to AI in Ironic Twist"
>slimy
I can't put my finger on it, but there's something off about this article, e.g. glossing over the opportunism (acting on "rumors"), drive-by claim about "strict safeguards [...] including monitoring and isolation", high horse attitude (we gave the guy a chance, we don't care about 1M USD, and while you fools are complaining we just tick this box and continue the pursuit of our noble goals for the benefit of humanity). I don't like it.
>a cached version of the internet
Interesting detail. A heavily pruned version, I assume?
The authors frame it as "a twisted and sadistic form of climate-change adaptation."
I read it, perhaps ironically, as colloquial/slang US English, like "lemme git to pushin' y'all!"
>this particular "persistence-model" was encrypted and locked away, even from OAI staff
source?
I successfully used it to re-slop Claude slop from 1+ year ago. Really puts things into perspective.
I tried the self hosted app some months ago, and while the vaults concept was nice for isolating e.g work and personal, some features were a bit clunky, something wrong with tagging or connecting contacts with notes iirc. In my opinion, it also had irrelevant features, I think it was mood tracking? Based on the experience, and the fact that the announced rewrite will be more "playful," I doubt I will try it again.
>planned to be temporary
Same for the Atomium in Brussels, Belgium.