News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

warofwords

Re:OpenAI DevDay 2025: Opening keynote [video] on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @08:19AM (#45502212)
Terrifying disaster for humanity this person is allowed to impact children .
Re:Learn Your Way: Reimagining Textbooks with Generative AI on Thursday September 18, 2025 @10:54PM (#45297478)
What is terrifying ,

'the best pedagogy' ,

OpenAI parents are not allowing chatgpt to curate pedagogy ... we all have a bookshelf thats it (our pedagogy) ,

but copyright strategies means the ai must mutilate / offuscate way best padagogy away ... they train on it and effectively say dont sound that good , too good is copyrighted

Re:Google search boss says AI isn't killing search clicks on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @03:49PM (#44816835)
Google search screams : monopolies screw consumers, Google search people loved , now ... its a joke ... its a pain to use Google search

LLM only option is to follow Google path , monopoly else unprofitable

Stake in the ground , as smart phones did ; chargpt will make future dumber + once parasitic dependancy goal accomplished

Schools/ universities getting obliterated student performace tanking. Their mission is parasitic dependence induction "helping the masses" .

Like Google they have successfully pulled the football from Charlie brown on any responsibility over the quality of information provided ... all the other llms are just mirrors of chatgpt conception of an ai interaction experience ... they just announced it gov grants openai perpetual subscription $ fee from every federal employees (so they would be collecting as the employer all of the employees internal deliberations as chatgpt logs which court stated could not be deleted) , it really feels like they are trying to digitize the teachers union lock on student thought and automate out white collar wealth that nip at the heels of capital class).

Re:Meta dishes out $250M to lure 24-year-old AI whiz kid on Saturday August 02, 2025 @01:28AM (#44765089)
I think Meta has a problem of none of their users wanting any more of their services and they have a very distinct brand taint

Paying 250m to a genius to more deeply entrap user time and attention is going to look diabolical unless there are measurable user life improvement outcome measurements... if metas more slop addiction that 250m is a diabolical contract