News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

w00bl3ywook

Re:LinkedIn won't show you your own connections without paying? on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @02:16PM (#16170829)
I wish everything was free.
Re:The sorry state of OpenSSL usability on Thursday December 28, 2017 @04:37PM (#16025100)
wtf.. donate/contribute
Re:FBI pushes private sector to cut ties with Kaspersky on Thursday August 17, 2017 @07:32PM (#15042039)
super surprised this thread isn't filled full of hate for our fed Intel teams. The IC works incredibly hard to keep us safe. Maybe this Presi and his hate for the IC is changing minds about our IC.
Re:Google AMP is bad for e-commerce on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @07:57PM (#15032452)
wtf is this guy talking about? This article has so many errors, it should be retracted.
I got the same benefit from joining science club!

Minus the brain damage.

eh? where does Google say it's the ONLY software to track applicants?
"we've collected enough meals that we like where we can just go to the local grocery store to pick up the ingredients and make it ourselves"

heh. welcome to a chef's world.

If you just now discovered market segmentation,you should probably start with a business class before jumping into payday loans.
Re:A therapy chatbot for depression on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:00PM (#14509426)
You will need to install the Facebook to try it.
Re:Colorado doesn’t need to replicate Silicon Valley on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @02:01PM (#14499460)
Sparkfun has not had to compete talent just yet. Wait until the competition for talent in Colorado reaches SV level. Sparkfun will have to stop relying on "I want to work at a cool/fun/relaxed place badly" and start paying market rates for talent. Take a look at their crazy application process. It's built around how badly labor wants to work there. This strategy doesn't work in SV anymore.. Good candidates want to get paid, not have "fun times" at work. Sparkfun's talent strategy is built on concepts that are well over 15 years old.