vunie
vunie on Hacker News
Compared to illegal mass surveillance programs that remain running to this day, and a witty intelligence head who remains free after lying under oath, this is a shinning success that should be celebrated.
Hopefully other nations follow their lead one day.
I don't know much about macOS development, but I am a linux developer by trade. Can you elaborate further on how linux doesn't do long-term healthy platform maintenance?
I also don't understand how long-term maintenance can be a factor when games don't run correctly on launch day. I would appreciate an explanation for this as well.
The same with Samsung printers division which is actually owned by HP. I think punishing a company for selling their trademark so that other companies can mislead their customers is a good thing.
In my eyes, GE is just as guilty as Haier & KKR.
Linux and macOS game development in a nutshell - spend $200K to make a buggy mess that doesn't work, get surprised when paying customers are upset"
The solution to leaking private information has been known for a very long time: Don't collect beyond the bare minimum required to render a service.
Microsoft should not have collected anything beyond an email and a password. Payment information should only be held temporarily.
Personal information is a toxic asset. It baffles me why companies willingly hoard it.
What about those messages before the signal protocol was adopted?
Has there been any weakness found in Telegram's encryption?
No demand for work is being made here. I'm simply saying a project that isn't a toy project will be criticized if it doesn't behave according to community standards.
I'd consider it to be social norms. It certainly isn't entitlement.
I don't know how to word this so I'll say it bluntly (and probably bear the blunt of this community as a consequence): If you're a developer of a project that is used in a security-sensitive context, you either be receptive to security concerns or you clearly label your project as a toy project.
No one expects you to write perfect code, but we do expect you to fix flaws when you learn about them.
Of course, you could do neither, but don't be surprised when people call you out on it.
That's why I never use my real google account with my phone. Android phones offer too little control over what is perhaps one of the most important digital asset I own: my google account.
It's amazing what credible competition can do. If only C had the same kind of pressure.
> you've also just communicated murderous intent.
No I have not. It's your bias that colored it that way. Reread my comment. I never said I want kill a thief for stealing. I simply stated that I will take back what is mine. If, and only if, the thief tries to kill me will I respond in kind.
Again, it has nothing to do with grandeur and everything to d with doing what is right. I will take back what is mine, and threatening my life wont stop me.
> I’m just assuming the above is not in good faith
Not GP, but your assumption is wrong.
It's not about the laptop. It's about standing up for yourself and doing your part towards society. You obviously don't agree with this stance and that's fine, but it's not your place to dictate what values are worth standing up for and what aren't.
I, like GP, fully intend to go after a thief. If he goes after my life, then I go after his. Either he gives up the laptop, or one of us gets killed.
It's as simple as that.
Exactly. I've never considered voice assistants because I don't want recordings of me or my family being used for who knows what.
I've just looked over the docs. I'll probably be playing with this very soon.
> If you need Photoshop, you'll stay on platforms where it's supported.
Sure, but your customers will resent you for it and search for alternatives. Vendor lock-in is not a good long term strategy. Competition will eventually catch up.
> If you don't, you'll probably not pay for it anyway.
This is speculation on your part.
Adobe moved to a subscription model. They lose revenue as they lose customers.
zero demand for a PAID Photoshop? If that's what the study really concluded then it completely failed to take into account current customers who want to switch to linux.
I would love to read more about that study.
This is what drove me to use Debian. I used to spend quite a but of time hunting down telemetry and other canonical-serving crap, but I eventually got tired of it.
With this crap and others (e.g. aggressive snapping), Canonical is eroding trust in its most important market. Inertia will only take them so far.
If I suspect that there is any chance my family's private information is going to get leaked, then I will not touch it. Appliances should never have internet access. Software updates, if required, should be delivered one-way through open trusted auditable software (something like ofw).
Big tech have already tricked me into supporting them with their "open platform" bait-and-switch before (android), that trick wont work on me twice.
>(Exception being if you use the dns challenge)
Exactly. DNS challenges don't suffer from this issue.
> Rooting won't help most of these devices. They just don't have the horsepower.
If a device can "display" webpages then it's extremely likely that it can handle tls.
> Moreover, they don't run Linux
That has never stopped people before.
Even if the number of boards was small, there should be some form of tangible proof instead of them just going off statements of unverified "sources".
I haven't read a single bloomberg article since they published that story. Journalistic integrity is very important to me.
Probably less impactful since we have alternatives that can more or less do the same thing. I think reddit is more impactful bdue to the network effect.
> What do you mean remote agents?
Sorry. I meant running an agent on a machine that is separate from the machine running huginn. The machine running the agent is not accessible publicly but has internet access (doesn't accept connections but can initiate them). huginn would be accessible publicly.
How well does it support:
- support remote agents and remote reporting?
- dead-man triggers for missing reports?
- is remote reporting properly secured? (encrypted/signed)
> I think Google is absolutely not at fault here.
Well I do.
If they had narrowed what information they collected to the absolute minimum and deleted it as soon as it was no longer required, then they wouldn't have any information to give.
Information is a "toxic" liability. Google chose to hoard it. They are absolutely liable.
Doesn't that carry a risk for Apple? I thought CA had some legislation specifically to deter lawsuits like this.
GCC still supports more architectures even if AVR support is removed.
>And here are plenty that support the converse
Could you site sources please?