vulkoingim
At some point my settings kept getting lost every time my mac went to sleep, and I had to restart the app all the time. I messaged the developer, but never received any response or acknowledgement and I just dropped it. It's a pity, because I did like it for a period of time while I was initially using it.
Another thing I've configured is scrolling through a key press and dragging the mouse. Or opening a floating menu by using the thumb button on my MX Master3.
And that's only mouse functions, I have a bunch of other shortcuts/remappings/automations, many of which run only for specific apps.
Have a look in the forum - it's gold mine and a lot of people have shared their presets.
You start with selecting genres you're interested in and can see exactly which bands match your selection from your library (or globally). You can also tweak the playlists in a number of ways through advanced filters like excluding tracks you've played recently, release dates, collaborations, different sort methods.
Recently I added a new feature - select a few (or one) playlists and create a "mirror", with tracks belonging to the artists of your selected playlists.
Also there are a few other playlist modes I'm working on that will allow you to make more interesting selections.
https://www.apple.com/uk/ios/feature-availability/#quicktype...
I am interested in something that has support for multiple languages + swipe support.
With the risk of sounding like a broken record - what are people using on iOS? I've been using `SwiftKey` for a while as it has dictionaries for languages that the native keyboard doesn't have. But I would love to switch to something else, as M$ has been shoving AI features on it that I am definitely not interested in.
So far in this thread I've seen Grammarly and Nintype. The former seems to suffer from the same things as SwiftKey, while the latter doesn't look it's maintained (last update 7y ago). I don't mind a paid app, as long as it doesn't invade my privacy.
Choose your genres (and more filters) and get auto updating playlists from your music library. Also just added a new feature - select a few (or one) playlists and create a "mirror", with tracks belonging to the artists of your selected playlists.
You get to choose the genres you're interested in, and it creates playlists from the music in your library. They get updated every day - think a better, curated by you version of the Daily Mixes. You can add some advanced filters as well, if you really want to customise what music you'll get.
It works best if you follow a good amount of artists. Optionally you can get recommendations from artists that belong to playlists you follow or you've created. If you don't follow much or any artists, then you should enable that in order for the service to be useful, as right now that's the only pools of artists the recommendations are based on.
Some parts are, but easily abstractable. I do have it on my list to support other services, but haven't had much time lately to tackle new features.
You get to choose the genres you're interested in, and it creates playlists from the music in your library. They get updated every day - think a better, curated by you version of the Daily Mixes. You can add some advanced filters as well, if you really want to customise what music you'll get.
It works best if you follow a good amount of artists. Optionally you can get recommendations from artists that belong to playlists you follow or you've created. If you don't follow much or any artists, then you should enable that in order for the service to be useful, as right now that's the only pools of artists the recommendations are based on.
I have a few other experimental features in the pipeline that will expand the music selection, but they are not there yet.
You get to choose the genres you're interested in, and it creates playlists from the music in your library. They get updated every day - think a better, curated by you version of the Daily Mixes. You can add some advanced filters as well, if you really want to customise what music you'll get.
It works best if you follow a good amount of artists. Optionally you can get recommendations from artists that belong to playlists you follow or you've created - if you don't follow much or any artists, then you should enable that in order for the service to be useful.
On iOS I'm also using the same app, with the Apple Speech model, which I found out to be better performing for me than the parakeet/whisper. One drawback for the apple model is that you need iOS/Mac 26+ - and I haven't bothered to update to Tahoe on my mac.
Both of the models work instantly for me (Mac M1, iphone 17 Pro).
Edit: Aaaand I just saw that you're looking for speech-to-speech. Oops, still sleeping.
One suggestion - in the demo mode it would be nice if you provide a sample GPX file which you can try right away.
But if you have any kind of playlists - it would work.
You get to choose the genres you're interested in, and it creates playlists from the music in your library. They get updated every day - think a better, curated by you version of the Daily Mixes. You can add some advanced filters as well, if you really want to customise what music you'll get.
It works best if you follow a good amount of artists. Optionally you can get recommendations from artists that belong to playlists you follow or you've created - if you don't follow much or any artists, then you should enable that in order for the service to be useful.
You get to choose the genres you're interested in, and it creates playlists from the music in your library. They get updated every day - think a better version of the Daily Mixes. You can add some advanced filters as well, if you really want to customise what music you'll get.
There are multiple ways to deal with ingestion floods. Kafka/distributed log is one of them, but it's not the only one. In cluster mode VM is a distributed set of services that scale out independently and buffer at different levels.
Resource usage for ingestion/storage is much lower than other solutions, and you get more for your money. At $PREVIOUS_JOB, we migrated from a very expensive Thanos to a VM cluster backed by HDDs, and saved a lot. Performance was much better as well. It was a while ago, and I don't remember the exact number of time series, but it was meant to handle 10k+ VMs (and a lot of other resources, multiple k8s clusters) and did it with ease (also for everybody involved).
I don't think you have really looked into VM - you might get pleasantly surprised by what you find :) Check out this benchmark with Mimir[1] (it is a few years old though), and some case studies [2]. Some of the companies in the case studies run at significantly higher volume than your requirements.
[1] https://victoriametrics.com/blog/mimir-benchmark/
[2] https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victoriametrics/casestudies...
(I'm not affiliated, but a very happy user across multiple orgs and personal projects)