vrfvr
I consider this a good thing. Wasting energy ain't good, especially when it isn't completely climate neutral
If we had more nuclear power, this wouldn't change much, if anything
Since both are not adequate replacements, costs for heating, electricity and transportation exploded.
This is total nonsense. The subsidy for fuel prices were introduced due to rapidly rising costs for fuel shortly before the war started.
Those costs didn't rise because of the CO2 tax.
The fuel subsidy also doesn't reduce energy taxes, but explicitly fossil fuel taxes for cars only.
I thin Rust isnt nearly as complex
If we continue down this path, were going to run against a wall
If it's gonna happen at all, there will be a law enforcing that, because it's not in the interest of website owners (which also leads to the dark patterns in the dialogues).
If there is law, people can sue, which usually is enough for companies to (usually) follow it
This isn't the case for do not track afaik
> The results, released in a preprint on 14 September1, found that most respondents were concerned about climate change, with nearly 60% saying they felt ‘very worried’ or ‘extremely worried’. Many associated negative emotions with climate change — the most commonly chosen were ‘sad’, ‘afraid’, ‘anxious’, ‘angry’ and ‘powerless’ (see ‘Climate anxiety’). Overall, 45% of participants said their feelings about climate change impacted their daily lives.
A click on the url to his homepage reveals that he is a backend software engineer who does volunteer work on free software and open protocols
It existed before.
Open source, such that anyone can use it