vkj-98

The files are received from the repo listing. If the files aren't in the raw report, that means your tests are running incorrectly. I've used Codecov for many projects and huge teams, no way what you say is true.

Can sonar cloud track coverage based on a specific test suite or language or file path as some repos have hundredth of modules?

I heavily recommend against this advice, because the person can't figure out how to use the tool and claims that source scanning by some third party, is "a good thing", especially after you see the kind of crap sonar agent installs in your CI.

Codecov will count untested files towards your coverage, as long as you properly run your tests. For coverage sonar cloud's implementation is rather poor. It also doesn't compare reports nor does it have any decent support for monorepos.

Sonar cloud also works with same coverage reports, so if you have that problem in one tool, you're likely to have it in the other.

Lastly, Codecov doesn't access your source code and does not slow down your CI, by at least 2 minutes.