News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

vgharl

Re:Chris Beard Named CEO of Mozilla on Monday July 28, 2014 @08:34PM (#8100083)
> Yes, $1000 is significant. $5 is not.

Let me guess: you decided this just now? Right? You're quite the asshole yourself.

> And others are free to demonstrate their disagreement, which they did with Eich.

Eich is not the leader of a fucking movement!! He's a private individual, that supported a cause in private. He's not Hitler, and this is not the Night of the Long Knives here.

You are advocating mob rule and mob justice. That is a sin far worse than supporting a movement to prevent gay marriage.

Re:Chris Beard Named CEO of Mozilla on Monday July 28, 2014 @08:29PM (#8100072)
> 61% supported gay marriage in 2013

So?????

You do realize that we're talking about Prop 8, which was 2008 here. Prop 8 passed.

Again, stop this revisionist bullshit.

> Does "JavaScript" pay Eich a salary?

Eich's entire fucking resume could be:

"Created JavaScript"

That's it. He would sail from conference to conference until the end of bloody time, raking in thousands if not millions of dollars here.

OkCupid wanted it both ways. They wanted to keep their skin out of the game when it would hurt their bottom line, but wanted to make political points for that easy PR gain. So they targeted Mozilla.

Re:Chris Beard Named CEO of Mozilla on Monday July 28, 2014 @04:43PM (#8099223)
Because if you are a reasonable person, then you realize crucifying a guy for having a consensus, mainstream opinion is absurd. It's revisionist, retro-active punishing from the political losers here. A majority of California agreed with him.

Not only that, but targeting Mozilla but ignoring JavaScript is the absolute height of hypocrisy and hollowless grandstanding, done by people that have a financial stake in JavaScript, but not Mozilla.

In short, fuck these people.

Re:Chris Beard Named CEO of Mozilla on Monday July 28, 2014 @01:11PM (#8098040)
> significant amount of money

Is that what we're calling $1000 today? That's not even rent money in the bad areas of the Bay Area.

> then whine that it's unfair

Citation please.

I really can't believe HN right now, trying to deny the fact that prop 8 passed. Unbelievable. Let's all rewrite history, getting rid of an inconvenient fact. Oh, and screw political freedom too.

Your sense of offensiveness is offending.

Re:Microsoft Looks to Cut Up to 18,000 Jobs on Thursday July 17, 2014 @11:59AM (#8048236)
> Lenovo has taken the Thinkpad line down the toilet

I think you're overstating things tremendously here. ThinkPad is alive, and from the reviews I've seen, doing well. http://www.engadget.com/2014/03/28/lenovo-thinkpad-x1-carbon.... Many buyouts end with entire products being canned.

I still have an IBM ThinkPad. They were good quality back then, but I really think the standard-bearer today is MacBook.

Re:Arc4random in libressl 2.0.2 on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @09:36PM (#8045570)
Must we bikeshed every issue there is, in such highly public fashion?

Not only is this entirely uninteresting, but this is not the way to do software development. Take it to the respective mailing list, issue tracker, IRC channel, etc. That's what they are there for. I'm sure it's less distracting to the developers as well.

> It would be nice to set the anti-tax-and-spend libertarians against the military budget, but they don't seem interested.

Of all the people you pick to blame here, you pick... the libertarians? Really? Really? The guys that have Ron Paul as their spokesman? You know, the guy that has spoken out every chance he gets about military spending and the cost of wars.