undo123

Is that $20k or 20x? Could legitimately see either.

Not looking to start or participate in a conspiracy, but I do think it’s valid to ask for both numbers: The number of people hospitalized (or died) who have C19, and the number of people hospitalized (or died) because of C19. Unless the coding systems simply can’t make that distinction, it seems like a no brainer to publish both numbers. The conspiracy theorists lose traction, and we get more data.

Despite this, I see precious few C19 dashboards that show the ratio. We’re lucky to see one that describes precisely what is counted as a hospitalization. We’ve had plenty of time to figure out how to report this, I’m stunned that there isn’t more transparency.

Isn't that the cumulative rate? It looks near-linear to me, which would mean consistent growth rate since March.

I think it's read as "how many people in (age group) have been hospitalized with C19" - note that the lines for all age groups are strictly increasing. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Does anyone know where to find absolute numbers on age distributions of people currently hospitalized with C19? We’ve seen enough misunderstandings of data in the news that I prefer to see data myself.

(Bonus points for “With-vs-From” data, but I haven’t been able to find that broken out in any public dataset.)

What I’m seeing is a model that has no concept of slippage. I suspect what they’ll do is have the fleet collect data to predict that coefficient of friction.

Seems plausible that they could ask all the cars this winter to report instances of wheel slippage, accompanied by video rewound with the spot the wheel slipped on annotated. Could have a prediction for mu at each point on the road ahead of the car. All the pieces are there, it’s just math and NN work.

I’m pretty sure they store far more than your standard black box. This guy was pulling video (and seemingly more) of crashes off Tesla computers from salvage cars: https://twitter.com/greentheonly/status/1329499639402389506

Model S/X have a center display and a instrument cluster display. You’re thinking of Model 3/Y.

This is fascinating. In short, the vision processing aspect still worked quite well, wrt. drivable area, lane lines, pedestrians, etc. Room to improve, for certain, but I’m not seeing a fundamental flaw here.

What’s left is the driving part, the “how to make the car follow this path” part. I predict this part will be ridiculously good once Tesla gets around to it. Imagine the traction control in your car, now with immediate-response electric motors, and it knows where it wants to go in 3d space (not just “driver is turning wheel to the right”, but actually knowing the arc to follow).

Exciting times.