tunared
Re:Please don't force dark mode
on Sunday January 19, 2025 @05:34PM (#42762745)
As someone that had cataracts, light mode was very hard to read. It was like looking directly into high beams. I used a dark reader plugins that was alright, but was not the same as a site designed to support dark mode.
Re:I Will Fucking Haymaker You If You Mention Agile Again
on Monday October 16, 2023 @12:23AM (#37895918)
Means dropping haymakers or swinging his hardest with each punch. No jabs, no uppercuts, just pure power generated from the hatred of the agile stand up meetings. More than likely a fellow Gen Xer who grew up playing punch out and watching Mike Tyson fight.
Re:CA Governor Signs Bill Allowing College Athletes to Profit from End...
on Monday September 30, 2019 @10:00PM (#21121320)
We can agree that profit is gross revenue minus expenses, correct? Non-profits are focused on maximizing the revenue, but not on the profit for the exact reason you stated, there are no share holders or investors that need to be paid dividends, etc. The non-profit is incentivized to put the net revenue back into the organization. This can be in the form of staff salaries, facilities, other programs in the university. The "profit" portion in a given year means they are just carrying over the revenue for future operations or to stash in a fund. It should not be used in a argument for the "major" universities or top performing programs as to whether or not they should play the players. Revenues are not an issue in those cases. Don't cry to me (universities) that you don't have the money to pay student athletes when your university made over $100+ million dollars in a year and you "barely made a profit" as a non-profit organization.
I can't find the original HBO Real Sports link, but they go into depth about the Non-profit status and the way the funding is spent. It is a real eye opener and made me rethink how the argument that profit/revenue should be considered when dealing with the larger organizations.
Below are references, but not only highlights.
Re:CA Governor Signs Bill Allowing College Athletes to Profit from End...
on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:12PM (#21120533)
The NFL has a rule for draft eligibility. You have to wait for four seasons if yo do not attend college. There are ways to get an exception, but it is rare. Makes it very hard to go from High School straight to the NFL.
https://www.nflregionalcombines.com/Docs/Eligibility%20Rules...
Re:CA Governor Signs Bill Allowing College Athletes to Profit from End...
on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:05PM (#21120502)
How are they not workers? They have to show up to work (practice) and play in games. If they get hurt, they loose their scholarship (just like an hourly contract employee).
Re:CA Governor Signs Bill Allowing College Athletes to Profit from End...
on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:00PM (#21120474)
The football programs are mostly non-profits, same with the NCAA. So no, profit, at least for the major programs, is not a concern. The programs receive millions from multiple sources that are spent on staff, coaches and other sports that need to be spent (Universities are not supposed to be profit making institutions). While the athletes that are generating the revenue through their performance every Saturday are paid with scholarships and money for room and board (can't be more than $60k or $70k a year - assumption here). Works out great for the coaches and administrators, not so great for the athletes. It is also not in the NCAA, college administrators, boosters or coaches interest to have the current setup change. Why mess with a good thing. No competition for player salaries leaves more in the coffers to pay the coaches.