tom9729
Later model years removed the ability to retract the screen on demand, due to backup-camera laws, and the 2021-ish refresh ditched the retractable display for an in-dash display similar to the 10th-gen Honda Civic (which amusingly, ditched the in-dash display in its 11th-gen for the previous A3 style).
This might be cheating but if you want a mostly screen-free recent Audi your best bet is probably the TT (or its big brother the R8 :-), the only screen is the entire gauge cluster and it's certainly not a touch screen.
Just do _not_ get a modern VW with its touch sensitive steering wheel controls...
Their motivations in creating GDScript are explained here: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/about/faq.html#what-w...
As a programming language it's pretty reasonable. The built-in editor has auto completion and documentation, you can resume from errors. The syntax is basically Python with optional type annotations. Comparing the Godot vs C# examples in the documentation makes me shudder at how much more verbose C# is in comparison.
As others have pointed out you can use C# if you want to. They provide a separate download for it.
https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news/tech/vw-infotainment-...
https://github.com/boundlessgeo/prj2epsg
GeoTools (Java GIS library) has several versions of the EPSG database available as JARs and you can use the CRS class to do lookups in both directions.
https://github.com/boundlessgeo/prj2epsg/blob/master/src/mai...
You may also be able to do a query on the SPATIAL_REF_SYS table in Postgres/PostGIS for what you want to do.
Hope this helps...
Basic auth is insecure (i.e. sending credentials in plaintext) and poorly supported by browsers. For example how would you handle these scenarios:
- Force users to reauthenticate after a certain period of time.
- Allow user to logout without closing their browser.
I think Basic auth is more reasonable for server-server communications, combined with HTTPS and client-certs.The best setup IMO is to have an HTTPS login page (form auth, hopefully with MFA) and use a session cookie. You can do server-side settings with this setup, you minimize the time when credentials are being sent (basically just once on login), and you can force your users to occasionally reauthenticate (either session timeout or manual logout) just in case they forgot to logout of a public computer.
For testing you could allow basic auth (make it configurable, or use user-agent sniffing to force browsers to use form auth).
Edit: formatting
It would be cool if Atlassian would open-source their client (SourceTree). They make money off of Bitbucket/Stash and provide SourceTree as freeware, so it seems like a no-brainer to open-source it and let the community port it to Linux.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3303 http://teiid.jboss.org/
The normal use case is to use the Teiid JDBC driver (or Postgres ODBC) to connect with the Teiid server and then that handles talking to your datasources via the translators.
I think there was some work done to make a standalone MongoDB JDBC driver using an embedded Teiid server, but I'm not sure how much progress was made there. Mapping document to relational can be tricky.
If you're using Java (JDBC), there's an embedded kit so you don't have to run a standalone server. If you're not using Java, you can run the standalone server which also emulates the Postgres ODBC protocol so you can (for example) use `psql` to connect and run queries.
Then why is no one using them?
> Hardly "new". Dependency systems in init daemons and service managers have been rolled many times, from the primitive need(8) facility to the LSB initscript headers (which almost all SysV-based distros had adopted) to OpenRC, Solaris SMF and so forth.
Exactly. Isn't the point of systemd to bring the ideas from launchd (and SMF) to Linux?
Gnome 3 OTOH is as you describe: giant touch-friendly menus, swipe to unlock (with a mouse), etc.
Your position seems a little alarmist. How does systemd mean you need to stop using Linux? I'm sure XFCE will continue to work.
Atlassian is expensive and only supports GIT, but the UI for VCS is way better (as is the Jenkins integration).
"To create a new project you simply register at SourceForge and then submit a new project request. Most projects are approved immediately, and you'll typically get an email notifying you of the approval in ~ 24 hours "
I'd imagine the main reason to go with GitLab is that it's free. GitHub Enterprise costs more than Stash (although it offers more).
Edit: Well, sorta. It sounds like Atlassian bought BitBucket but ended up rewriting it as a standalone product (instead of SaaS).