News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

tmosleyIII

We're currently doing this internally for the dermatopathology lab that I work for
A silent call is when the phone is connected to a base station and forced into transmitting, you don't notice your phone is doing it.
Re:Stingray manual released on Friday March 27, 2015 @10:12AM (#9276350)
There currently is no need to use stolen SIM card authentication keys.
Re:Stingray manual released on Friday March 27, 2015 @10:07AM (#9276324)
They have full cooperation and it is definitely not just GSM.
Video conferencing is a premium product and a big money maker for them. The hurdle comes from needing someone to monitor the video calls while they are on them. So video calls need active monitoring while voice calls are more passive.
I've installed quite a few of the existing solutions in quite a few prisons. I think the biggest factor that you pointed out is the existing provider.

Currently, there are only a handful of major players that really offer services in corrections. They are all currently trying to turn into the Apple/Google/Microsoft of corrections. So when you are trying to offer SMS services, they already have those services bundled. Along with video visitation, commissary, grievance reporting (kites), inmate phones and just a whole list of other services.

If you are doing an application for a tablet device then you wouldn't need the steel inmate proof case. Quite a few of the current tablet solutions are see through plastic.

The best way to get your messaging solution into prisons is to piggyback on other solutions. There are quite a few companies with solutions that are running around trying to throw what they have on as many platforms as possible. The key is to build a platform and have it to where it runs your messaging app.

Another thing with some of the current messaging solutions in the corrections market is that they will charge the price of a stamp for messages.

If installation inside of a prison is another hurdle, there are companies that you can work with on that.

I was dealing with this for about 5 years and have a whole bunch more to say about the opportunities but I'll just stop here.

Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel on Friday March 13, 2015 @03:14PM (#9199299)
I apologize I read that last line right after I hit reply. I still cannot transfer files. I use it to manage the existing FreeBSD\Windows\Linux boxes that we currently have and have a bunch of templates that I use already.
Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @07:06PM (#9188072)
I have a Dell XPS13 running Ubuntu and I use the vSphere Web Client in Chrome to manage our infrastructure.
Re:Prison Bankers Who Profit from the Inmates on Wednesday October 01, 2014 @09:02AM (#8394043)
JPay does have competitors and there are a few opportunities out there but the Request For Proposals that come out are for a lot more services than just payment.

The opportunities available for the future are ripe for a startup but no thinks of startups in Corrections.

Re:Prison Bankers Who Profit from the Inmates on Wednesday October 01, 2014 @08:56AM (#8394031)
It is a competitive process but like you said, once they get in it his hard to dislodge them. JPay has been dislodging other incumbents more rapidly in the past few years. There are a few other companies that are out there but their name isn't in the news like JPay.
Re:The Kids Who Beat Autism on Friday August 01, 2014 @10:58PM (#8123858)
My 7yr old son is autistic and so much of what this article says and what others have commented, has been the same wild ride for us. He is a happy happy little person that wants to laugh and be loved (and eaten my Zombie Dad once in awhile.)

For the other parents out there, I don't know if they have it in your state but Ohio has things like the Autism Scholarship and grants from different Autism groups. Those really helped with those sessions not covered by insurance or being able to go to a school that provides a little more help.

Re:Android IMSI-Catcher Detector on Friday August 01, 2014 @12:08PM (#8120914)
Very true, its just that it isn't something an app will save you from. The mobile tech is the key.
Re:Android IMSI-Catcher Detector on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @07:15PM (#8111525)
It isn't an Android only thing, all devices will be found and you would not know.
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Monday July 28, 2014 @02:00PM (#8098343)
There are sources available that can be found with some digging. I'm just speaking on the stuff that relates to the work I do.
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Monday July 28, 2014 @07:24AM (#8096101)
Yes,they do.
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Monday July 28, 2014 @07:16AM (#8096080)
It would be interesting to test this out
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Monday July 28, 2014 @07:14AM (#8096071)
There are agreements in place
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:58PM (#8095099)
Yes, not without permission
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:55PM (#8095093)
Its not just about detecting a tower, they spit out a friends list for your phone to know the different zones in the area. That list changes.
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:50PM (#8095074)
That is just an IMSI catcher, the real answer is "Possibly, but not likely"
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:48PM (#8095069)
That doesn't actually happen
Re:Stingray, the fake cell phone tower on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:45PM (#8095059)
It is very possible to get the traffic for CDMA devices and those devices grab GSM and CDMA alike. The issues are dealing with the newer tech.
I work in the corrections industry and need a device that is the polar opposite.
Re:How the NSA can 'turn on' your phone remotely on Saturday June 07, 2014 @04:48PM (#7863054)
You can probably take a look at some AT commands to see what all is possible: http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gts/07/0707/05.00.00_60/gsm...

As far as how easy, you just need the right hardware and software.

Re:App-pocalypse Now on Tuesday February 25, 2014 @11:21AM (#7298467)
Imagine an environment that was not connected to the Internet but you still needed to deliver services through handheld and desktop platforms. Would you go native or a web (internal) based solution?

All devices would be the same and all users would have access to same services.

You can find a lot of open machines and sensitive information using Google, this one for the HP printers was submitted to the Google Hacking Database[1] in 2004.

[1] http://www.exploit-db.com/google-dorks/

Re:The Sparrow Problem on Monday July 23, 2012 @07:41PM (#4283579)
Isn't Microsoft using the SaaS model for desktop software like Office?