News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

tmiahm

Re:GE buys out entire NYT print paper in historic first on Tuesday December 06, 2022 @10:46AM (#33881917)
This is a pretty good book that captures a lot of how GE went from probably the most influential company in the business world to what they are now: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/50086786-lights-out
Re:Would you take free land in rural America? on Sunday January 30, 2022 @12:30PM (#30139093)
XOM 10/30/2020: 32.62 01/28/2022: 75.28
Re:Procedural Worlds from Simple Tiles on Sunday January 09, 2022 @09:22PM (#29869858)
This looks like a preview of Advent of Code 2022
The difference is your example uses bool values, the code in question uses expressions that (should) evaluate to bool. && is short-circuited if a is false, such that b is not evaluated.
Re:We may soon have city-spanning 900 MHz mesh networks on Sunday March 07, 2021 @12:13PM (#26377584)
A network for Amazon devices is certainly one use case. Another is selling network access to other IoT devices.

I would expect most residential broadband TOS would explicitly prevent reselling their network bandwidth/access. That's what you are doing with networks like Helium, even if it is in the form of a token instead of dollars. Amazon has gotten around this by just not paying. You buy the Amazon device, you provide the network access, Amazon gets the revenue.

Re:We may soon have city-spanning 900 MHz mesh networks on Sunday March 07, 2021 @11:26AM (#26377150)
The author is conflating max allowed bandwidth from the bridge to Sidewalk server with per-end-node bandwidth. The 80Kbps includes the bundle of all of the LoRaWAN messages it has received for all end-node-devices within range. This is a marketing point to show the Amazon device owner that this won't consume large amounts of their bandwidth. The Things Network suggests a maximum expectation of 250 BITS/s. This is not going to replace cell networks. https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/lorawan/limitations.ht...
Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @10:50PM (#21077706)
I really enjoyed the author's perspective on this, and I like well-reasoned arguments from people whom I probably don't align with politically. To confirm my assumptions, I checked the About page

> Matt Stoller is a Fellow at the Open Markets Institute

Ok, what's that? A Koch sounding name, but I'm guessing more Soros because of the repeated calls to government action on this (and the Dodd-Frank connection). A quick search led to a Politico article https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/14/open-market-instit... which contained this nugget:

> Despite its small size — 15 or so employees operating out of a shared WeWork space in downtown D.C. — Open Markets...