tjarratt
There's a lot of engineers at Pivotal, and we have a lot of projects, so maybe I can prove I worked on that codebase by referencing obscure details from it? I remember writing a LOT OF TESTS that used quotes from Wutang Clan and 36 Chambers as strings for names of entities, and a lot of references to 90s hip hop. Was this the same project?
Also, I took some time after our project (and several others) to start a small example of applying Clean Architecture in a toy Go Project, which is open sourced. Maybe check it out?
The fact that there aren't any prolific bloggers, open source contributors or HN commentators is an artifact that the company does not encourage anyone to do that -- in fact, they actively discourage anyone that isn't involved in open source work on Webkit or Obj-C or Swift from talking about their work. For better or worse, they still have a culture of secrecy around their products.
For what it's worth, I really enjoyed my time there and wouldn't trade it for anything else; I worked with a lot of fabulous teams, learned a lot, and got to build some really amazing stuff.
I certainly couldn't find any better tools in Golang when I started, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone had started one since.
It seems like the authors of Golang believe that a lot of problems with languages (refactoring, updating code to work with new libraries / versions, etc) can be solved as parsing problems. Hence, Golang has a lot of good tools for parsing text.
They even ported yacc to Go (via Plan9). http://golang.org/cmd/yacc/
What seems really odd to me, is that the market for creative talent seems to want the cheapest, least skilled talent for some reason. I suspect this has something to do with how we as a culture value creative art labor versus programming labor.
No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame. http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-ip...
Blocking this deal makes sense, unless you truly believe that businesses should be allowed to screw over customers AND remove any choices they may have for competing products. Do you really want to defend a monopoly?
Everytime my artist friend wants to put their portfolio online, I suggest they start by writing some simple markup and half an hour later I'm explaining the finer points of the box model while they whinge about how they'd rather be using Adobe Illustrator. The truth is that there will always be a group of people that are able to visualize what they want to create better than they can verbally, or symbolically.
Apple isn't afraid to have a bad idea and then toss it out because, after all, ideas are cheap. If you build a turd and you polish it, are you still going to release that polished turd? The Apple way is to design it the right way from the start, THEN you polish it.
I, too, worked as a contractor at Apple for a while and it was a little depressing how few people actually used the interior courtyard. Occasionally I would have my coffee out there to enjoy the sunshine, take some notes and people watch, but mostly it was an empty space that collected dead leaves and dust. My impression of the cafes in every building is that they were slightly subsidized to encourage employees to take their coffee break without leaving (which has the added benefit of avoiding potential leaks). Every aspect of life at Apple is highly controlled (to a degree, some areas less than others), so it isn't surprising that this extends to the cafeterias, stores, cafes, parking and even the printers.
I can't even remember how many days I got to work when the sun was coming up and left as it was setting, or after it set. It was like a perpetual winter.
With the latest chrome, you can't see "fork me on github" - only "cause i rock" backwards - this is a known bug with reverse css but is easy to work around.
In Safari v5, you can see 'fork me on github' but it disappears on mouseover.
Very cool demo though.
That's precisely why I'd want to read it. There's something fascinating about peeling away the layers of reality (and un-reality) in SJ's speeches, mannerisms and writing.
There are too many choices and everything is fragmented to the point that it's hard to find any common ground between ruby developers, js / jquery developers, old school c++ hackers, bash-scripting sysadmins and even perl gurus.
Emacs definitely isn't the most popular editor I've ever used though. When someone asks me why I use it, I usually give a short one minute demo where I macro a bunch of changes, show git integration, multiple buffers, and use some pre/post save hooks. Few editors come close to matching Emacs feature set.
disclosure: I'm currently writing a small node server in emacs. I'm happy with both as they are very responsive, but emacs does chug occasionally like a bro at a frat house.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
# Force all clients that hit this host to www.nintendo.com
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule .* http://www.nintendo.com/ [R,L]
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Nothing is worse than trying to go to foobar.com/something/I/know/exists and being redirected back to the homepage. What's wrong with deep linking and respecting URLs that a user has been to before?
More importantly, doesn't this interfere with bookmarks?
One question on my mind is whether the stats are legit. If it's not some quirk in Apple's reporting system, maybe someone is maliciously hitting the link to the 'site of the day'. Wonder what the logs for that webserver look like - is every user agent an iOS device as expected?
I haven't spent much time digging into the iOS app pirating community, but my expectation is that users are less likely to pirate if there's a free version of the app. What exactly does prompt someone to crack a 99c app and make it available to other users? Why would someone go through the trouble to get it that way when it's so cheap?