News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

timup

I agree with both comments, especially the faq language. Often times, lightheartedness in the tech space comes across condescendingly. A simple explanation here would suffice...and if it is truly magic, I'm all in.
Re:How the Web Became Unreadable on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @10:03AM (#12743821)
Good read. Will credit Apple for beginning to move away from this trend. Take the Apple Music app in the iOS10 release...thick, chunky, bold headers, much better contrast.
Re:Facebook React.js License on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:56PM (#12702687)
I disagree.
Re:Facebook React.js License on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @03:23PM (#12695744)
Yes at all:

"If you or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that this implementation of Polymer or any code incorporated within this implementation of Polymer constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any patent rights granted to you under this License for this implementation of Polymer shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed."

Re:Facebook React.js License on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @01:48PM (#12695019)
Polymer has nearly the same provision. They're sneaky about it as it doesn't appear in the main license. http://polymer.github.io/PATENTS.txt