timedrun

Re your comment: From the recruiting side, it has become painfully difficult for us to get connected to top performers. AI submitted CVs are garbage, LinkedIn Recruiter is garbage, online platforms like Indeed and Glassdoor are filled with AI-submitted CVs - it's painful for us. Open to solutions and new ideas tbh.

Creating a protocol that would solve it.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

The generated content is wasting the time of maintainers. How would you solve that?

For your winning argument, what would you use to prevent slop filling up your feed when there is more AI generated content, any sort of protocol that you have?

Your community members like your product enough to tell you about this, so you could announce the camping issue to your community members.

You could also ask your community members to adopt the email/messaging protocol which will require legitimate emails to include parameters which you and your community members can decide on.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

Anti-spam email/messaging protocol that is simple, cheap to implement, directly compatible with email/messengers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders, and does not require the sender to pay to send a message. For people who receive too much marketing spam, survey spam, low-effort cold emails, and want to be able to easily filter spam successfully because you do not want to waste time on them.

Future-proofed and will work on AI spam in the future too, unlike current spam filtering methods.

Creating a email/messaging protocol to solve spam, which can also be used to solve LLM generated spam pull-requests. It is directly compatible with email/messengers, including all of the large email providers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

Creating a email/messaging protocol to solve spam, which is a different problem from verifying sign ups to solve spam sign ups in this thread, but is relevant for people in this thread interested in the issue of spam. It is directly compatible with email/messengers, including all of the large email providers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

Yes there was no concept but it is actually not necessary. Sending being "free" is not an unsolvable problem if you design the protocol correctly. It is very difficult to solve spam but it is possible to solve it, and without depending on just one platform.

Creating a email/messaging protocol to solve this. It is directly compatible with email/messengers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

Creating a email/messaging protocol to solve this. It is directly compatible with email/messengers, including all of the large email providers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders.

Check this profile for the email if you wanna ask for more info or get updates.

Anti-spam email/messaging protocol that is simple, cheap to implement, directly compatible with email/messengers, low false negative rate compared to current spam filtering, free for senders, and does not require the sender to pay to send a message. For people who receive too much marketing spam, survey spam, low-effort cold emails, and want to be able to easily filter spam successfully because you do not want to waste time on them.

Future-proofed and will work on AI spam in the future too, unlike current spam filtering methods.