tika
Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”
on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @09:38AM (#11026620)
271 is rather small. Which means this fake prime was quite easy to generate.
Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”
on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @09:35AM (#11026603)
:D
Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”
on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @09:30AM (#11026574)
Yes, but 1/2^80 is ridiculously large compared to 1/2^1024.
Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”
on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @09:23AM (#11026540)
"There are 2^1024 - 2^1023 = 9.0e307 1024-bit numbers"
This is the count of 1023 bits numbers [(x - x/2) = x/2]. 0 is a valid leftmost digit.
Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”
on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @08:51AM (#11026407)
2^1024 is a lot larger than 2^80. The implication is clear.