tianon
"Moving" is a bit of a strong word. It would be much more accurate to say "providing alternatives". For example, the "golang" image now has an "alpine" variant for each supported version (https://hub.docker.com/_/golang/), but the default variant is still Debian-based (especially given that switching the base outright would break far too many existing Dockerfiles). Additionally, the documentation calls out that there might be libc compatibility issues in the spirit of trying to ensure our users are properly informed about the potential problems they might run into in their quest for the smallest possible base: https://github.com/docker-library/docs/blob/b7b6b86124682ef1...
I would definitely welcome PRs to make this verbiage more accurate or more informative of pros and cons.
https://docs.docker.com/articles/networking/#ipv6 has more of the details (and the discussion at https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/8947#discussion_r22534... is also useful)
Basically, we can't use existing router advertisements (as I understand it) because you also have to tell your current IPv6 router that the entire prefix you use for Docker needs to go to this one host as opposed to just the one IPv6 address that host would auto-assign itself via RA.
Since there's manual outside-Docker setup involved, we can't really automate this bit. If there's a nice clean way to do so, we're definitely open to a PR (I'd love to have something simpler myself)! :)
LABEL boot2docker
MENU LABEL boot2docker v0.5.2
KERNEL boot2docker/v0.5.2/vmlinuz64
APPEND initrd=boot2docker/v0.5.2/initrd.img loglevel=3 user=dockerSee also https://github.com/steeve/boot2docker/issues/48 which has some more information about this specific issue.