throwawayalien
My immediate thought was that those 3 lights are forming the pyramid's base - not just the single prominent blinking light.
But checking the reactions across the net, everyone seems to be focused on the singular blinking light. Am I missing something here?
In the beginning of the video, you can see more of these lights as the camera pans away from them, too.
That said, because they're very common, and that there are many stories about them across the history (and not just in recent times) and from many different sources, and that there's a lot of government documentation, and the fact that even Pentagon officially recognized that there's something going on, should be at least enough to steer you away from saying something is just 'bs'.
This is why publishing such articles is important, and why they should make more people think that there is a possibility after all that humans are not the only ones in the universe and that life is all around them.
This is such a preliminary line of thought, that, if most humans lack this perspective, why even begin to engage?
There's a reason people like to put such a spin on articles like this, and it isn't only because they want more clicks.
It's because it's related to one of the most important questions humankind has ever asked for many centuries.
That, and there are a lot of these reports throughout the history about this. And in very recent times, Pentagon officially recognized such phenomena - phenomena that is very similar to what is described in the article. Is it, then, so unreasonable to use a similar tone in such an article?
Why would you be "so sick" of it? Instead of allowing yourself to wonder at the sheer vastness of the universe and asking yourself similar questions, why would you choose to be so put off by it?