throwaway91241
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032801/
Here's the raw data on prescriptions and outcomes summarized in that paper, built from claims data for 2000–2005:
Opioid Dose and Days Supply
total addiction
No opioid use 371,371 150 (0.04%)
Low dose, acute 90,415 111 (0.12%)
Low dose, chronic 6,902 50 (0.72%)
Medium dose, acute 83,542 101 (0.12%)
Medium dose, chronic 3,654 47 (1.3%)
High dose, acute 12,378 15 (0.12%)
High dose, chronic 378 23 (6%)
So acute opioid doses 3x your risk of addiction, no matter the strength. And long term dosing will 18x to 150x your risk, depending on the strength. Relatively few people are receiving chronic (90+ days) opioid doses, but those that are have a significant risk of addiction.I'm not the right person to do this analysis properly, but I'd hardly call this "thoroughly debunked"
> Exposing information about someone that is largely already public
A home address may be public, but the connection between that address and online activity, like posts on reddit / HN / some forum (political? fetish/porn? extremist? etc etc), is very much not public. Last 4 of social is not uniquely identifiable, but a (partial) home address almost is.
> If you have a specific target, you probably know their name
Not if they're being careful, like anyone would be if they don't want their posts online mapped back to them. But now you can DM them a link (or email them an image if you have an email address or redirect) and turn their IP into a home address. That's very bad.
Doxing someone isn't just exposing an arbitrary address, it's connecting a purportedly anonymous online account with personally identifying info.
Going back to the president, what if you could find out that some angry anonymous person posting racial slurs online was actually the POTUS? That is doxing.