throwaway373438
throwaway373438 on Hacker News
What the flag code says about clothing is as irrelevant as any other hot take on the issue.
When the question is of how to travel between cities or states, why do you find the relative safety of low speed non-highway driving to be relevant?
Something that stood out for me is that the author did not mention ^V, which is very useful in quoting metacharacters. Take the tab example: The author seems to imply that PCRE is needed to match a tab because there is no \t escape sequence in BRE/ERE. Presumably he cannot just type in a tab because he's using a shell like bash, and tab has a special interpretation and cannot be typed in as a string literal.
The way around this is to use ^V as a terminal escape sequence, followed by simply pressing the tab key. This technique can be used to insert other control characters as string literals in arguments. Want to grep for EOF? "grep ^V^D" will get you there.
Doubling the cost of the ice cream infrastructure to avoid a 25% downtime may not be a profitable venture -- especially if the downtime is scheduled to occur while the store is closed.
Here's the catch: Large buffer sizes only increase efficiency for sequential reads. mmap() is still much faster for random access within a file. Doubly so, because we need to not just read() but also lseek() for every read.
The inefficiencies of read() can be minimized in the sequential case only.
With mmap() of course we only ever have one syscall to create the initial mapping. Everything else is a memory read.
We can get read() down to just one syscall too, with a 4G buffer ;) I can't recall if GB sized buffers are possible, but I have certainly used MB sized read buffers for exactly this reason.
It's not an add-on feature. The ramifications are a completely different way of shuttling the data between endpoints.
What's prohibited is targeting people with speech who do not wish to participate (or who cannot, statutorily). Plenty of adults freely choose to engage in abusive relationships with one another and of course they are free to do so provided the other party is a willing participant.
The same is true of non-abusive language. Consider a simple romantic overture.
The lines are drawn around consent. Not content.
There's a definition problem here. We could use "no one is talking about removing the content" as a rubric to determine whether content is truly outside of mainstream thought for example.
Pointing out that there's diversity among mainstream thought is not at all the same as tolerating dissent.
It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done.
It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.
None of those things would work.
Besides, creating minor differences do not solve this problem as they would still be derivative works.
Your argument that the copying is once-removed is unfortunately irrelevant to copyright law.
We aren't talking about user interfaces here. This lawsuit does not involve UX. We are talking about interfaces between functional components. The analogy is spot on.
There's also the idea of making friends with someone who has a larger vehicle. Minivans work almost just as well and are more commonly available.
We have made other mandated changes which have been vastly more expensive.
This is not a true statement. Uber is not worth $55b because they have performed a lot of driving work. Uber is worth $55b because they have constructed a system in which driving work can be easily scheduled and allocated.
The value is the system and the system was not created by drivers.
The system was created to serve drivers and riders together.
"yet receive very little of the value they created."
They have received all of the value from the driving work they performed, in the form of a 1099 paycheck. There is a fairly clear market rate for driving work.
They did not contribute to the construction of the $55b system.
"How much of Uber's value do they deserve? "
None.
These people don't know how the technology works, but they do know that we tag and track animals. They're not wrong that we use microchips in this fashion.
37% federal
13.3% state
3.8% Net Investment Income Tax
54.1% total, before this new tax.
What on earth does a lack of labor rights have to do with capitalism?
Labor can be -- and often is -- unprotected in all economic structures. A laborer in a communist state has historically had very few labor protections.
Taking a quick photo doesn't illuminate the LED for long enough for a human to reliably notice.
"because you've also broken physics "
Or merely recognized the role of the human element. A shame, Apple was once good at this.
The tax change isn't a reduction per se, it's a change in the way we account for losses across multiple years. It's also very new -- it's removing a new carryover rule that was added in 2017. I think it's also disingenuous to frame this as a reduction as the losses would be carried forward anyway. It is, like most of the other "corporate handouts," more of a shift in when the money is paid rather than a change in the amount.
Unemployment is money given away to another. It's a permanent giveaway.
A debt purchase is either money that was given to you, that you're now returning (Treasury securities) or money that you're giving to others which will be returned (corporate bonds). It's not a giveaway at all - the net exchange is $0.
These cannot be compared as equivalent.
The tax reduction changes the way loss is calculated to better capture the reality of the economy falling apart in one year, letting losses be deducted from income generated in past years. There's a tax savings, but it's reflective of real loss incurred by business.
if MACINTOSH_DRIVERS
config ADB
bool "Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) support"
depends on MAC || (PPC_PMAC && PPC32)
help
Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) support is for support of devices which
are connected to an ADB port. ADB devices tend to have 4 pins.
If you have an Apple Macintosh prior to the iMac, an iBook or
PowerBook, or a "Blue and White G3", you probably want to say Y
here. Otherwise say N.
Perl generally outperforms python in core language features.