throwaway-jeN0S
throwaway-jeN0S on Hacker News
Re:Google Adds WireGuard VPN to Android 12’s Linux Kernel 5.4 Tree
on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:19PM (#24827810)
I you read the thread on NetBSD mailing list I linked to, that was exactly my concern: the spec does not seem to be enough to implement the protocol according to the original author but he seems reluctant to give details.
And I do not consider NetBSD core team as amateur, frankly.
Re:Google Adds WireGuard VPN to Android 12’s Linux Kernel 5.4 Tree
on Monday October 19, 2020 @11:27AM (#24827226)
I am not advocating for competing standards. I am advocating for open standards and competing implementations.
Both of your examples point to competing standards: IE6 was a tentative to fork the web standards by Microsoft. The 20 USB form-factors are different connector standards (even if they all implement the same wire protocol).
Re:Google Adds WireGuard VPN to Android 12’s Linux Kernel 5.4 Tree
on Monday October 19, 2020 @10:15AM (#24826538)
I have mixed feeling about this: it looks like the author believes only him can implement it right [1].
This not how internet protocols development work. The spec should be enough, including security considerations. And multiple competing and interoperable implementations should be seen as a good thing in my opinion.
[1] http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2020/08/thread1.html#0...