throw368498
Re:United Airlines 767 Returns to Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks A...
on Monday June 01, 2026 @06:17AM (#48354863)
Your response is doing nothing to disprove my point. If anything it’s just another data point in support of it.
Re:United Airlines 767 Returns to Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks A...
on Monday June 01, 2026 @05:17AM (#48354427)
Someone writing “F Zionists” very likely does not make a distinction between Zionists and Jews.
The Jewish Council of Australia is not going to name their hotspot “F Zionists”. Ultra Orthodox Jews are not going to use swear words to express their view.
I’ll go as far as say that anyone who genuinely wants Jews and Arabs to live in peace side by side is not going to go about it with antagonistic one-sided rhetoric.
Re:United Airlines 767 Returns to Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks A...
on Monday June 01, 2026 @04:55AM (#48354252)
Depends on who’s saying it. Often times it’s obvious from the context that “Zionist” is just being used as a loophole, and pretending that the difference is then still important is disingenuous.
Re:United Airlines 767 Returns to Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks A...
on Monday June 01, 2026 @04:44AM (#48354168)
To the antisemites it’s the same thing.
I can point you to threads here on HN where negative things are said about Jews and the term “Zionists” is used interchangeably with “Jews”.
Re:United Airlines 767 Returns to Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks A...
on Monday June 01, 2026 @04:26AM (#48354041)
Needs to throw in a bit of that to gain the approval and upvotes of the antisemites.