thitcanh
If you want to have CF change the host to something else, like censored.com, this domain must also be part of your controlled domains, which means CF can’t be used for this purpose.
This at least was the case last time I looked into this (12 months ago)
It’s also possible that this feature is enabled for paying users, which I wasn’t.
Heat and energy savings only apply to the direct user (in this case Apple Hosting) and unlikely to be passed onto you (since it’s Apple).
We’ve already seen this with M1 computers which are simpler and less expensive but did not have a lower retail price.
This is not acceptable for a $2000+ machine.
Apple really skimps on RAM and my new iPhone can’t take a photo without purging every single other app.
It’s abuse because people buy it with the intent to return it. Buying it and then honestly changing your mind is fine, but Amazon probably determined that wasn’t the case here.
If I can write monaLisa() and get a nice painting on canvas then that really was 1 LOC.
What line count doesn’t include is the weight of the dependency, which may or may not matter.
By the way you could just use the images served from WordPress.com I assume… unless the ToS don’t allow that.
I always wanted to do this but every solution requires some non-free PHP hosting alongside the static host. WordPress.com doesn’t let you customize it unless you pay and if you want to use it headlessly you have to build a non-WordPress template elsewhere.
I have a low-traffic low-edit WordPress site I want to staticize, but no solution is server-free.
Some airports are in a good position to implement this already: Singapore airport has security checks right at the gate so you go through them and wait a short time in the seating area. When the plane is available, boarding happens immediately. What’s missing here is that the check-in desk is still way before this point.
- less competition for the affected routes
- harder transfers between modes of transportation (physically)
- harder bookings across modes of transportation
- disappearance of entire routes made possible by hubs from flight-only OTAs (the vast majority of them)
I agree with the sentiment, but I suppose they should just be taxed higher and somehow forced to include a note like:
“A train/bus transfer between CDG and XYZ is also available with <third party>. Wanna book just up to CDG?”
How about you just show me a list where I can mark what I like and then get a list at the end. Then just switch phones and see each other’s list. Instead of an exact match, you limit each other’s choice to 10 movies you just picked.
I don’t think computing is seen strictly as a gender-restricted job like, say, mining and teaching, I wouldn’t expect much friction in the way of a young girl to be potentially interested in it and begin a career.
It just doesn’t happen that often, however. Does it have to be someone’s fault?
Likewise showing me a car shop job would also be wasted, not because of my gender, but because I have no interest in cars, as my Facebook profile clearly shows.
You can see bias anywhere you look, but if you look well you’ll see that it’s just a natural consequence of the real world.
If a user joined a car shop group, said user is likely to be interested in car-related jobs. It happens to be that most of these users are men. The algorithm is working as intended.
In some fields this difference isn’t as clear or obvious, so we end up with these articles.
Not an excuse, but it can be frustrating.
The golden rule is that if a button opens a link to a page that has its own URL, it should be a plain anchor tag.
You can apply whatever JavaScript on top of it to “ajaxify” it, as long as you ignore altered clicks (ctrl, cmd, shift, etc)
The author argues to NOT use fake anchor tags like <a href="#"> and then add functionality to it via JavaScript. Instead you should use <button type="button">.
Either way, JavaScript is required.
What you’re suggesting means your link is actually a link to another page, which works without JavaScript and that’s not the point of the article.