News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

thirdwhrldPzz

Mirror neurons and nostalgia for a particular modal.

When a mind latches onto a modal for problem solving, every problem is a nail.

Technocrats have to try and illustrate the value of their technocratic solutions.

Re:End the Streaming Struggle with Plex on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @09:02PM (#30927152)
They’re easy to spin up in a Docker too.

Linuxserver.io hosts containers for Plex, jellyfin, and a bunch of related apps, with example compose or shell scripts.

Re:Elon Musk to join Twitter’s board of directors on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @07:16PM (#30926383)
There are many who became millionaires through unions.

It’s almost as if humans will work to enrich each other and the numbers game is artificial political semantics; millionaires appear in both constructs!

At least I can vote and discuss openly union operations.

Not so with Papa Elon. The outputs of labor are his preferred targets.

Why does humanity keep doing this?

Oh and governments serve at the will of the people which seems fine with the status quo. I’m not expecting much movement there. Any improvement on Main Street has to occur within politics as usual which means deflating Elon for change.

It’s really sus to suggest his vision for the far future is possible given he sits right at the same edge of discovery we do. “Outlook uncertain” for that far down the road is the only honest answer. Especially when “build rockets to nowhere” and even EV production are exacerbating industrial feedback loops threatening the species.

Diversity in thought leadership is good, imo.

Re:Elon Musk to join Twitter’s board of directors on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @05:25PM (#30925239)
Yeah there is a clear difference. I never said there was not.

Strawman.

I have a very high iq; in a past life I designed power switching machines and high performance boards for Nortel. Also that’s an appeal to higher authority.

Also these companies are pretty data driven through automation; big banks are run from 2GB excel sheets. It’s just people doing math and the ones doing best also happen to have political tradition on their side.

Musk is still just one man.

Re:Elon Musk to join Twitter’s board of directors on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @04:49PM (#30924823)
Everyone is a hypocrite from some context.

Really I just don’t think anyone should be above the real hands on work of supporting their existence.

Term limits for these roles should be explicit, not a game of they who can possess the most minds the longest wins.

The promise of human colonization of all of space time is still a high minded fantasy which makes this “hype/gossip my way to wealth” seemed designed to intentionally manipulate the same basal biology religion accidentally latched onto.

Who knows, maybe rockets to Mars are all wrong and we should be doing something completely different; information doesn’t need to just travel in a ship, but Star Trek seems to live long and prosper in his head.

Re:Elon Musk to join Twitter’s board of directors on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @04:38PM (#30924695)
All of it is taken from him not releasing source code.

From him not unionizing his companies.

From the officially documented history of his business acquisitions where he bought up business that already existed.

This approaching 1984 level double speak. It’s the lack of effort that speaks to his motives. Where is the code for his machines that can choose to plow into us? But somehow Twitters algorithm is super important.

Edit: tacking on his desire to burn up fossil fuels on rockets while the UN is announcing we’re firmly on track to an unlivable ecosystem. We are not optimizing human economics but Elon’s.

Re:Unreal Engine 5 is now available on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @03:28PM (#30923749)
These tools are still going in the direction of making a person sit in a chair all day.

What will really be a game changer is AI that can generate the bulk structure having been trained on our best of the best hand built models and we can iterate on the emotional details.

I’m working on the “bulk structure” part, training models to generate random game worlds that roughly adhere to the rules, look and feel like everyone favorites right now (while avoiding copyright issues).

After that my goal is empowering consumers directly to nudge the styles in their preferred direction.

I’m mostly motivated by the MBA-ifying of everything. My goal now is to just have AI produce new content for me, even if such a thing puts game developers out of a job. I’m starting to experiment with cartoons as well. Optimizing for myself like we do.

Re:Elon Musk to join Twitter’s board of directors on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @03:16PM (#30923603)
He also loves free speech except when employees discuss unions.

He wants Twitters algorithms to be open, but his cars must stay closed.

Requesting anything of him is anti-freedom then he projects at others how they could do better in the same contexts.

He’s like a crazy TV Lenny salesman who has never actually invented anything net new. He’s playing the acquisitions of other people work game to prop up his preference to not work.

Normal humans should not be given extreme leverage over other normal humans. Lie to me about “free markets” but as one of the 13% with and advanced degree, mine being in math, the average person has no ability to smell through his BS in detail, but they have a gut sense he’s just another used car salesman.

Re:Ask HN: When did 7 interviews become “normal”? on Monday April 04, 2022 @02:39PM (#30910460)
Here’s my investment advice; go back to the late 90s, load up on tech, use the gains to dabble in btc, use those gains to retire by 40.

Worked for me.

I know how the boring numbers game works and optimized for it. I’m being honest instead of equivocating in Anglo-babble reasons why a process is an acceptable measure for filtering some people. To see poetry in this is a bit weird. It’s the same old fundamental arithmetic operations applied to different geometry. Pretty routine for us been there done that’s.

I want to say it was during college years which for me was mid 90s. My focus latched onto anything I could apply elastic structures to; advertising/marketing and it’s effects on economics.

Circling high minded wisdom isn’t new. Tribal chieftains, god kings, preachers, now the nerds promising human longevity and prosperity for all-time to come… if we all just follow this model, it’s ours for the taking! Not so new.

I’m still waiting to be impressed.

Onward with the next generation rug pull. They got pensions in the 80-90s. It was reported Trump and co were looking into leveraging 401ks for gambling, but they used covid to hand over stacks of cash without question to leverage the average workers debtors prison they find themselves in.

It’s the circle of life, Simba.

Maybe I’m weird but I never had faith in them.

I don’t know when I learned it, but I’ve looked it up a few times to be sure I’m not day dreaming; after the WW2, declassified propaganda research became the basis for ad and marketing programs in university.

It’s always been about establishing a mood and inserting a meme to go with it. Maybe that’s “gotten worse” as we whittle stats looking for growth. I think people are just aware of what’s always been true.

Somewhere along the way it became blind allegiance to a certain kind of agency, like a religion. We’re all busy FOMOing, being ourselves, like the Sprite commercials told us, we miss that we’re just shuffling along the same old routine as dad and grandpa, feeling too unique to be required to grow a potato or sew a pillow.

Re:Ask HN: When did 7 interviews become “normal”? on Sunday April 03, 2022 @10:14AM (#30897074)
There is no misunderstanding on my part.

I never consented to this culture. I see little different here than a church, meat based tape recorders thinking the noises they emit are “the way” with little proof except “feudal capitalism” continues to “work”.

We don’t owe deference and agency to CEOs, VCs, and founders. The syntax is different but the LARP of being sheep for “wise men” is the same.

Only 13% of the country has an advanced degree (mine is MSc in math earned in the 90s; I’m old) and knowledge is not locked away in those heads. Education does not make people infallible and omniscient.

This is a result of traditional political memes; owners rule, everyone else drools. The filtering and sorting inside that cognitive bubble is just the proles making proles dance like jesters. No scientific theory makes this the one true way of organizing effort.

Memorizing semantics is not proof they’re correct. If GME can be shorted to the extent it is despite that being illegal, our institutions are built on deference to BS, since that system is the bedrock used to prop up tech VCs.

Disliking contemporary office life is not equivalent to not liking working with people.
Re:Ask HN: When did 7 interviews become “normal”? on Saturday April 02, 2022 @07:44PM (#30892703)
Research into who brings value, what technologies improve efficiency, has been inconclusive. The models end up with so many variables the conclusions are meaningless; any one parameter is insufficient, all the parameters needed mean no one parameter is greater than another. How can a value assessment being useful given all the required context that also has to exist? Is it a measure of value or traditional human bias?

Humans are prone to group think, belief in words of power, sigils; why believe in unfalsifiable value assessment when it comes down to tried and true ownership?

If traditional politics win at the end of the day why the belief this matrix of value isn’t just another cognitive boondoggle?

Humans have longed relied on metaphor and analogy to provide context. Chemistry is a contextualized generalization of certain physical phenomena.

Neurons are just temporal spatial events of various mathematical parameters; gradients and ranges of heat, light, etc.

Everything is some form of “how matter happened to coalesce relative to light during $arbitrary_date_time_range”

Or it’s all the specialized language of chemistry and biology.

Six to one, half dozen to another. Normalizing the descriptions isn’t proof of correctness, it’s a specific normalized set of glyphs to simplify communication.

Re:Ask HN: When did 7 interviews become “normal”? on Saturday April 02, 2022 @03:43PM (#30891077)
How do we know this isn’t blind faith and the numbers are “made up”?

Other than fiat wealth generation, what gains are there to treating each other like this?

UX creates context from the users perspective, not the back end data format. This format creates a headache in that nothing can parse or write it except the humans that learn it.

I can easily search an SQLITE file from a CLI (wrote me a tool a long time ago to fuzzy find). I doubt the YAML lib for Python is going to become obsolete soon. I can instantly work with that format on any machine with a common language. There’s already Taskwarrior.

It’s electrons in a machine, hundreds of different paths to porting it around, changing it, etc.

Look, don’t get me wrong; I’m not about to pour sugar down someone’s gas tank. I’m just walking through my inner monologue debating this format someone chose to put up for open review and discussion.

Some people claim to aspire to.

It’s always people. Biden is a person. Putin is a person.

Hiding behind language like country or state is part of the propaganda and mind virus such people rely on, insuring agency defers to concept. They’re self serving people, not concepts.

Sure; I’m just expressing mine. The “glyphs and how to display or sort them wars” aren’t important enough to me to take real offense to alternatives. This is just idle discourse for me.

Lindy Effect type thoughts, why import another dependency; familiarity, existing portability, and habits with current formats; deep and wide tooling and language support… road built; let’s drive to shovel poetic drivel out the door.

Still, why plain text? If the goal is “wrap it in UI” why a new white space, special characters.

Why not YAML or JSON and the vetted libraries to read and write the format?

As a user I don’t really have any concern with what underlying data format and structure it stores things in. I want to manage my todos!

This could be an SQLITE file for all I care.

Software engineering should be about more productive UX, not flexing one’s ability to parse arbitrary syntactic art.

Re:The singularity is close? on Thursday March 31, 2022 @05:54PM (#30872628)
Pareto principle; we get 80 percent there and that last 20 becomes the new 100.

We keep diving into one infinitely big little number pattern fractal after another, chasing poetry to alleviate the existential dread of biological death.

The idea we can fundamentally hang the churn the universe given the vastness of its mass and unseen churn is pretty funny to me.

Information may be forever but without the right sorting method you can’t reconstruct it once scattered. Ah, our delusions of permanence.

Higher educations origins are in insulating Bourgeoisie kids from working class life.

As it became clear the people had lost belief in god kings, aristocrats began paying the church to educate their kids and confer nonsense degrees the proles could not falsify.

It was not hard learning guitar on my own. We create a lot of carbon mess for junior to get to an official guitar degree.

There is a whole lot of unnecessary LARPing deference to wealthy people who don’t do much of the real work keeping themselves alive.

It’s not a sustainable social meme to tighten the screws on the masses while handing their own kids the keys to the castle. 800,000 sworn LEO in the US, beholden to a paycheck and retirement account. None of the people at my local bank own that bank anymore. Why is my agency propping up someone else’s grandpa?

Our natural state is change even after death. You’re changing without even willing it right now, in ways you’ll need to adapt to sooner or later.

All you seem to need to change is the grasp on the idea who you are now is eternal.

Your comment comes off like the world must now stand still for you. Hard pass.