thereader12

If llms can read minds then life for humanity will get so much worse hypothesis 2 won't matter. You may be right but it ould be pretty bad.

Its because the triangle of good, cheap, and open favored them. Just being good isn't enough unless you're number 1 but likewise neither is just being open (ish). It was important to release the wieghts and the research because otherwise good wouldn't be good enough to outweigh the risks.

Seems simple enough.

Does the bill affect human users, maybe you're interpreting this better than me.

"Knowing the identity behind a crawler tells us relatively little about whether its behavior is harmful. Under the New York bill, a company that discloses its identity and then accesses the website 10,000 times a minute complies with the law even though it is still imposing enormous and likely unjustified costs on the site. But a journalist anonymously using a crawler to investigate potentially anti-competitive practices by tech companies does not."

It does seem like this bill mostly affects normal users and is suspect with more surveillance being pushed. However the biggest problem is that the internet is global and the fees only apply to the US. If bots from Russia, China, India, or even France are scrapping then how would this even reduce the bots? Seems more like a new 'contempt of business model' is the purpose of this bill.

That's the sort of thing you really don't want to hear from your encrypted mail company.

Elon Musk did the Nazi solute twice on live television and is funding the Nazi revive movement in Germany. Like the KKK had 3 iterations, but no one says group 3 isn't the KKK just cause they are less powerful.

Do you have investments in the big US companies?

The non-deterministic nature is like the main feature. Also, you could be a cpu with enough patience, you would still be non-deterministic.

Resin is not similar, it's very toxic and it accumulates.

So like sitting at a coffee shop next to the theatre. Or chatting with a person on the street.

Is that last bit supposed to tongue in cheek? Sarcasm is difficult to read through text.

They unionized because people were already dying.

Crime has been going down since they took the lead out of gasoline. The world and the US especially has been getting safer every year since before the 24 hour news cycle. Seriously, you are safe and have been safe for decades from random crime. It wasn't some busybody's cameras.

It wasn't a hypothetical, the op was listing things that both literally are happening and that ALPR's (and flock specifically) are enabling. "Hypothetically" was a bit of rhetorical flourish.

The difference between these roles is prestige among other programmers. I don't know why we want to categorize by vanity.

That would be speculative, it should only be added in the hypothetical time the productivity actually goes up. Even then, it should be some years in and with third party sources like all of Wikipedia.

Computer vision and categorization is ai. It isn't just generative AI.

I genuinely never heard of this. They claim to be the only service that does this but that's better than nothing at all.

The take was so mild, no one disagrees with it. The llms were also explicit asked for this, seems very 'aligned' ie corporate safe. These takes need some more pepper honestly.

I wish there was something that could be done beyond feeling powerless. 4k+ tvs mean nothing if it is constrained whatever meager the bitrate companies feel they can get away with streaming.

Yeah, Google is doing what Microsoft and Apple did, get their product in schools so that the adults will demand it at work later on. They had already been doing this with Chromebooks.

However,now the product is human intelligence and the motivation is ungodly amounts of debt the economy is linked too. AI literacy makes no sense, the whole purpose is you don't need the literacy, it understands normal human speech.

It's unconscionable, but Google seems to be making the kids dumb on purpose. If the kids are dependent on AI then the market will always exist. It is weird cause Google isn't even in first or second place, but maybe brand loyalty can win out?

So, apparently the bbc has started charging Americans.

It is clearly protectionism. You can argue that is justified, but prefering blocking foreign companies to protect your nation's own interests has a word.

I feel like the is an assertion of an opinion. One that assumes that animals are not doing complex stochastics. We can't prove it either way, only guess based on what we currently know.

Hasn't either openai or anthropic already explicitly said open models are dangerous?

You'll find aviation politics is not too far off. But basically all pilots train single engine first abd America invented the plane.

Next year as in < 3months from now. Not that long.

If you were going to sell but learned something non public, then letter of the law says you can't make a decision to no longer sell.

It just isn't provable, I think it it is technically illegal.

They refuse to release the models, the training method and, training data. They don't even want you to ask it too many questions lest you teach another ai. Very "open".