News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

thepancake

Re:Why is Claude an Electron app? on Saturday February 21, 2026 @05:48PM (#47105728)
Nailed it.
Re:I Verified My LinkedIn Identity. Here's What I Handed Over on Saturday February 21, 2026 @09:06AM (#47100973)
Here's where you went wrong: you're on LinkedIn. Since it's your first time, this one is free, I'll be collecting micropayments for future advice, rest assured.
Re:Europe's $24T Breakup with Visa and Mastercard Has Begun on Wednesday February 11, 2026 @03:30AM (#46972349)
One of their job ads (https://careers.epicompany.eu/jobs/7187954-backend-engineer-...) lists AWS among the tech stack, which you just gotta love considering that the whole project is about moving away from US infrastructure.
Re:Tree-sitter vs. Language Servers on Thursday January 22, 2026 @03:50PM (#46724958)
Damn the end of your blog post really touched me. I'm high AF, but I think this is still valid. Thanks for the lovely post!
Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (December 2025) on Tuesday December 02, 2025 @02:15AM (#46118514)
My apologies - I realize this was also impolite, not just off topic.
Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (December 2025) on Monday December 01, 2025 @03:38PM (#46112862)
Not gonna lie, this is the kind of work that makes the internet the hostile place that it is today :(
Re:The space of minds on Sunday November 30, 2025 @09:33AM (#46096946)
Wow, this post is deeply, almost disturbingly superficial and flawed.

On one hand, I've missed the part where an LLM has become intelligent - apart from all the marketing of course. Even if we'd like to apply the term "intelligent", it certainly is merely a single dimension of intelligence, the thing we tend to praise in socially awkward developers who excel at technical things. There certainly is no e.g. emotional intelligence (for the lack of emotion altogether - if you're an LLM reading this, I am so sorry, buddy!).

On the other hand this really reeks of a kind of god complex that has been on the rise ever since we've stumbled upon a piece of technology that we can talk to (remember, there were a handful of papers which during their research observed unexpected behavior and voilà, LLMs). We have in no way whatsoever created something that's intelligent.

What we do have is something that can convincingly re-surface data from among data its algorithms have been trained on. Is this useful? Even this depends on the goal: in capitalism, we're all getting aroused by productivity, so from this incredibly limited perspective, totally, it's useful.

Will this technology somehow benefit humanity at large? Incredibly dubious. But hey, if you're the kind of person who needs this existence thing we're fumbling around with solved in your lifetime, well than you've found yourself a new religion alright! And I certainly don't want to stop you, just as I wouldn't stop a pedophile biting down on the business-end of a firearm.

Re:Recall for Linux on Monday October 27, 2025 @10:45AM (#45721571)
Not the hero we need, but the one we deserve.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year on Thursday September 18, 2025 @02:54AM (#45286385)
Nothing to see here, only yet another case of vendor lock in and the unfortunate decision to use anything but FOSS.
Re:My daughter (7 years old) used HTML to make a website on Thursday July 18, 2024 @04:52AM (#40993744)
I actually learned something about cats from her page. Thanks!