News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

thenewewb

Re:DJI Mavic 3 Drone on Friday November 05, 2021 @01:09AM (#29115675)
I typed a reasonable reply to this but it got flagged. It shouldn’t have been flagged, it was reasonable and didn’t label anyone as “bad guys.” I don’t like that we can’t talk about DJI being bad, because they are a Chinese company, despite it being obviously true.
Re:DJI Mavic 3 Drone on Friday November 05, 2021 @12:10AM (#29115349)
That’s a totally fair point and I’ve edited my post to more properly reflect how I think about it, without the virus word association.
Re:DJI Mavic 3 Drone on Thursday November 04, 2021 @11:58PM (#29115281)
How’s that?
Re:Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @12:07AM (#28452914)
With regard to gay marriage - Donald Trump ran and won in 2016 on a platform that included the recognition of gay marriage as a settled right. AU and US aren’t so different!
Re:TikTok CEO Kevin Mayer to leave the company on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:09AM (#24290856)
Maybe it’s just not good to be the head of Volkswagen in 1944.
Re:Keyboardio Kickstarter Day 1278: A startling discovery on Sunday December 16, 2018 @11:39PM (#18696927)
This reads to me like Keyboardio is lying and blaming it on “business overseas.”
Re:Questions on Sunday September 30, 2018 @05:25AM (#18105374)
In order:

Inflation, regulation/globalism, corrupt system, wait, don’t, up to us all, good question, good question, remove politics, no, books, papers, don’t try, no, false laziness.

The comments here are so far extremely biased towards panic. It’s worth considering that perhaps the world’s governments aren’t panicking because it’s not warranted.

Climate change, while generally “accepted,” has a pretty amorphous definition and most current research agrees that there has been a pause since 1995 or so. Given that we are in a 20 year “pause,” it’s not entirely unreasonable - though clearly heretical - to posit that the alarm is largely unwarranted.

Year after year we see climate predictions fail to come to pass. Good science is based on hypotheses leading to testable predictions, and global warming predictions have a really poor track record of accuracy.

It might be time for the more scientifically minded among us to start increasing our criticism of climate alarmism.