thathappened

Latency is usually from bandwidth being queued somewhere along the path

Can't the weight be calculated to see if additional components were added between mock-up and production output?

I know weight is how you double check other manufacturing

We're learning that good is relative so do no evil can't mean anything good for us, long-term, unless we're Google.

This might be true but it's not needed.

I'm looking for the documentary about the US economy and the silent industries that secretly prop it up.

Taxing people is work. To make an industry responsible allows both government to not invest and risk additional losses but allowing people to overpay gives them a surplus while allowing for those that make mistakes that cost the government to recoup in justice fees.

I remember the video having lawyers asked what the most profitable industry in America was, they all claimed the legal system when it was accounting.

Don't forget that finite and finicky. A large download over a slow connection has a larger chance of being interrupted.

Everyone knows a interrupted update isn't good and downloading several times isn't good either.

I was a weirdo making stuff before I researched if it already existed back in 2004.

I made a site for musicians to post music, sell or distribute it merch, control previews, analytics, yadayada all on an calpop p4 server when my then gf told me about Myspace.

I moved on to other things when she showed me FB and I learned I couldn't sign up without a .edu, they lost me there.

I registered in 2006 for a blind date, uploaded a pic of a salad bowl, never spelled my name correctly or used my real dob (I'm a melinnial and knew in 94 compartmentalize my online behavior) and doubled with an ethos crafted around consistency, I've done alright for my generation.

No friends, but still alive!

Everything is relative and nothing is unique at a large enough spectrum

I am. This morning qanon said FBI opened an investigation on him and his site opens a virus only on chrome, as of this morning.

Google q anon posts but skip the dot com on mobile.

Seems as though something big related to integrated intelligence and politicians about to happen.

After learning about the war on drugs being a ploy to build up the gun and law enforcement markets.

I wondered if Bitcoin was created by the us to launder and fund projects while still maintaining control over the majority of it and possibly use to collapse other currencies and governments.

They already print cash so we know the anonymous currency isn't frowned upon and the only banned Venezuela crypto none of the other seeming shady coins.

I wonder if this is their answer to their absurd requirements to get into American Universities

Does no one care that Digital Ocean is owned and created by Russia? You're all worried about apps, what about the hosts they use?

Your mind wouldn't ask a brick to show it a mind would it? It identifies something similar and depending how important it serves it's purpose it'll keep evaulating how much can be learned by this.

Keep in mind we're only letting "intelligent" people contribute to this conversation and that in itself is biased. Why aren't we trying to identify why schizophrenic or people with split personalities chime in on why they perceive things differently and manage to survive.

We say they're unsuccessful in life but by our standards and that's not much different than a servant of a faith, no?

That's all your minds looking for. Things that change with a pattern it can differentiate. Bricks don't change unless something you understand changes it. Like inertas definition or Murphy's law, an obersavation of change from a perspective.

This is where relativity comes in.

What's good or bad? You can't compare anything too distant or you loose sight of the differentiation.

That stone is mater just like my brain but one was assembled molecularly a long time ago and the other evolved and was likely billions of molecules from around the planet at the time the stone formed.

I have info in my brain that's really only useful to me from a distance but truely only useful to my cortex, but my boss likes what I do with it for him. He says I do a good job but his competitors think it's all bad and some of my employees also attribute my success as a bad thing. But is that thing they consider bad me or something relative to them and not apples to apples to what my boss considers good?

So this is really just like communal imprisonment vs jail in other societies

Sympathy for habitual criminals?

If you draw all of the system out you'll see it's no longer tangible and that's why FDIC allows for 99 years to make good on that promise. I think the math works out that inflation alone in a system that survives 99 years can recoup any system that collects an average of 30% recirculation

Reads like the smaller banks buffer a run on the central bank and there's no buffers on digital because it's 24/7 and no centralized control.

Isn't a run literally based on the fear the system is overextended and those last will be losers?

Isn't this the whole purpose of crypto? To extend credit when earned therefore not overextended like credit systems?

My understanding is any government vendor has to let said government at least audit the source if not provide it to allow then to modify for the equipment they purchase.

With that said , if they also control the land it's being shipped through I recall pictures of nsa intercepting Cisco boxes to update FW.

So really it's a matter of which government you want spying on you and whether you keep MGMT private or not.

I noticed you use cogent, aside from some peering with Verizon and others, are you sure your transit capacity is available by cogent and he? Had issues at choopa and only peer with them

There's maps but wework has open and gigabit

I can't wait for an open source car marketplace with standards and blueprints to order or 3d print yourself. I read about more ecar companies like one in upstate NY making old bronco like SUVs

I always hated middlemen but as I got older and saw the difference between creators and capitalists. You don't see the 50% being spent to maintain the relationships that bring buyers in and interested in supporting the artist. Arts subjective, you can play the free game and use the internet but if you want a network of people that support galleries it's because they gained something from that gallery at some point. Also that gallery isn't free, some are cheap and some don't earn their keep but you get free choice and no known test to differentiate the honest from the dishonest but experience.

How about be upfront and let the user make an educated decision based on performance or longevity rather than a legal one from just the sole manufacturer?

Where did I agree to updates that slow down the phone? Some hpones even try to sell you it'll work for 2-3 versions then backtrack and say nevermind buy a new one.

No one has integrity because no one builds anything of value for a while. It's inherited and they skip out because they saw it work out in the past.

They could put effort to clean up and optimize but they move on once it's literally not profitable

You have a quality of work mentality in a business running in a capitalist society. Theyre less removed and have to force you to abandon quality time to focus on new things just like your competitors.

There's little management innovation, they all mostly copy each other

Anyone else think things like this, dns, ssl authority, and lots more a better areas to focus blockchain tech toward?

This is a misconception of spacetime. The object exists, it just consumes faster than it dissipates mater. Just because there's no discoverable interaction between the consumed matter doesn't mean it doesn't happen, which is all time really illustrates.

But even how we illustrate a sheet of spacetime we show it dip when it should stay flat and pinch, closing the gap between atoms as they get more dense.

All of these inaccurate descriptions assume we have the concept already in mind to recursively look up. Describing more accurately let's the reader get a clearer picture and thats where real concepts get conceived.

I like heavy/dark star/planet for a vague description. I also think the fact that humans rely on visuals now and we can't get more than a single angle of one of these we can show anyone a 3D view of how it's not just nothing.

Amazon was a phase. They bridged the gap of DOTcom and new thinkers not interested in starting a devops team to begin.

Now DO, vultr, and other options exist to fill the gaps more.

Aws was never the solution to content distribution or infrastructure replacement. Just a company smart enough to notice big gaps and not afraid to fill them to get the ball rolling, maintain and progress, then move on.