tgasson
For @defer, the transport is a stream[2] where subsequent payloads are tracked ("pending") and as those payloads arrive they are "patched" into the existing data at the appropriate path.
Both of these are effectively implementations of this Progressive JSON concept.
I can picture a future where both the JSX and object payloads are delivered progressively over the wire in the same stream, and hydrate React and Relay stores alike. That could potentially simplify and eliminate the need for Relay to synchronise it's own updates with React. It would also potentially be a suitable compile target for decoupling, React taking ownership of a normalised reactive object store (with state garbage collection which is a hard problem for external stores to solve) with external tools like Relay and TanStack Query providing the type-generation & fetching implementation details.
Using `new Promise()` in the client-side store would also mean you could potentially shrink the component API to this. `useFragment(fragment IssueAssignee on Issue { assignee { name }}, issue)` could instead be `const assignee = use(issue.assignee)` and would suspend (or not) appropriately.
[1]: https://github.com/facebook/relay/blob/main/packages/relay-r...
[2]: https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/blob/main/rfcs/DeferSt...
That can be easier since you can add metrics to each individual field rather than url, allowing you to deprecate rarely used fields knowing what you'll break and alert only those who are using it of the change
At some point later 5 mutated from looking like 4 to as it is now.
It's the same reauth you sometimes get when visiting a public blogger site. It is an edge case, but quite unpredictable and hard to track down from client reports.
Sometimes google will make already logged in users reauthenticate. It will redirect to the authentication page and you'll get a bunch of HTML rather than json returned, and the user won't know why it's not working.
There's still some issues we're having. SVG rendering performance isn't fast or consistent across browsers for 3000+ polygons and although TopoJSON shares arcs between common boundaries the rendered polygons don't. Also the large differences in the size of boundaries we're dealing with means the map needs to be zoom-able. Delivering higher detail boundaries dynamically is tough problem to solve. Ideally you could request a bounding box from a TopoJSON based server, and it would deliver a delta of higher detailed points precomputed from Visvalingam’s algorithm[2].
I found the default quantization level to be much too blocky. For anyone working with TopoJSON I'd recommend you first raise the quantization level while looking at your smallest features until they're no longer blocky, then use the inbuilt simplification to bring the file size down to manageable.
[1]: http://www.bts.nsw.gov.au/BTS-Visual [2]: http://bost.ocks.org/mike/simplify/ (explained at the bottom)
In respect of Offence 4, Mr Assange contended that whilst rape was a Framework Offence and therefore didn't require dual criminality, the conduct described in the EAW was not fairly and accurately described and that if it had it would not be rape.
edit: Thanks for clarification.
Also this seems like self-blogspam. Why not link straight to the site where the copy reads much better. http://phototags.me/
http://lawshop.com.au/products/internet_law_nz_3rd_edition-8...
`module` defaults to {
id: ...
exports: {}
parent:...
filename:...
loaded:...
exited:...
children:...
paths:...
}
Every file essentially has two lines at the top.
this = module.exports;
var exports = module.exports;
foo = 'bar'; // can also be written as this.foo = 'bar';
exports.foo = 'bar';