t0rt01se

Wow!! I wish I had this perspective 13 years ago during those dull courses describing the mechanics of an MLP.

I broadly agree with your thrust but I'm going to assume you're a bot. Who would benefit from such a perspective as yours?

Is calling that which calls everything a psy-op a psy-op also a psy-op?

The word you seek is 'sarcastic'. The ever so slightly neuro-divergent don't do sarcarsm. Nor do linkedinlunatics.

Chin up. There's always the civil service.

Do you have any data to back up the claim that it's "quite common" to work remotely across countries within the EU/UK. Almost nothing in the "common/single market" works uniformly across the "common/single market". For instance this guy (OP) doesn't have a hope in hell of landing a job anywhere in the EU even though he's in the UK.

Ooc what did you mean by 'their own' industry? The industry of making regulations or the food industry?

Didn't read but they could've gone for a more catchy title eg. some bad apples spoil the barrel

I apologise in advance for making light of the situation in your country, but did you find the peace awards more meaningless than Hinton's award for PHYSICS?!!

Out of curiosity, is packagingnews.co.uk a site you visit frequently for industry news or the first that come up on google when you searched for coca-cola's recycling activities in the UK?

> most of the pollution comes from seaboard cities in developing nations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_wise_monkeys

It's not difficult to spread something that's already popular.

I don't buy the "flatlands to the west" either. I'd sooner buy they want some more coastline with warm water. I imagine Canadians on average will be less pleasant if they're stuck with a hostile U.S. to the south.

Please read my comment again. Perhaps you aren't suggesting the opposite.

The "zero evidence" claim is a blatant attempt to shift the burden of proof. In my opinion the burden of proof remains with those hypothesizing zoonotic origin.

Can't wait for these to be launched in my city! Love from Dhaka.

More cobras in the wild! Result! As as aside, you'll find a cobra isn't an apex predator - a King Cobra ... now that could be considered. Every incentive humans have ever dreamed up has had perverse/unintended outcomes - what's your point?

The credits get mined based on proof of existence and then can be traded. 'Given' was the wrong choice of word.

This seems like the more sensible approach - to understand/learn how to protect ourselves from malaria/dengue/etc. rather than gene-drive systems to eradicate (certain types of?) mosquitoes.

The 'science' isn't conclusive that salts of glyphosate are harmful to insects. Please stop with your anecdotal experiential evidence. Hopefully you've been in the 'home of the brave' long enough to get sarcasm.

Screw carbon credits. Countries should be given credits based on the number of (non-human) apex predators in the wild within their borders and any carbon-intensive/polluting economic activity should have to be offset against these very expensive credits.

The same can be said of numerous products/industries 'disrupted' by YC/HN types. Kettle/pot? Specialized are no angels themselves. There are no sacred cows anymore - sorry but screw your small/local/artisanal shite - this from someone who would've ordinarily supported your sentiment. But these aren't ordinary times - the quest for economies of scale will bring scorched earth to everybody one way or another.

I know and I appreciate your effort to educate / warn. But you do realize that most of these posts are made by shills ?

Can you please do the Kiwi accent instead?

So long Moderna, short condom manufacturers isn't a good idea?

Well neither of them were successful so we're both clutching at straws.

Ha! Good catch! My comment above won't do? Research funded by the University of Life.

A 'decent controlled study' suggests that 'decent controlled studies' measuring 'charitable impulses' are not all that decent or controlled.

Nazis probably had great big charitable impulses towards one another and those that looked/behaved like them. If they were mindful they probably would've observed their biases.

A recent study suggests that the BBC uses phrases like 'a recent study suggests' when they actually mean there's some anecdotal evidence.