sweuder
If you search "NOVA food classification system" there is a PDF guide as the first link.
This article is shallow ad for a drug company.
Google has a pretty streamlined process to take back control of these too so maybe its pretty commonplace.
(Obviously not relevant to ferrari)
If the goal is to listen on your computer instead of your phone you could probably use spotify or apple podcasts or whatever.
Personally one of the strengths of podcasts is that its audio-only, so I can listen while on the go/doing non-cognitive work. Perfect use-case for a phone, but to each their own.
>but also I gotta have my "expert on topic talks to me about interesting thing" content.
You should absolutely be listening to podcasts. This is literally the main strength of the format. What do you mean you "never know how to play them" ?
Whichever phone you have there will be abundant free podcast players in the app store, you can look up and subscribe to their feeds and listen through that. Longform interviews or conversations on every topic imaginable.
Its entirely based in what you are watching. If you watch very little on the site then yes, obviously they will just throw random stuff at you that is popular. The recommendation algorithm has nothing to go on.
["Popular" in this case usually means trash since the videos that get the biggest on the platform ARE clickbait shallow garbage because the vast majority of watch time is from kids and teens.]
If you seek out creators and channels that you enjoy/find useful, actually engage with the algorithm by subscribing to quality channels, hitting "not interested" when the recommendations miss, suddenly you'll get better results.
One very recent (1 month maybe?) change that ive noticed is that Youtube tosses in WAY more tiny channels into the recommendations. I get recommended videos with ~1k or less views all the time. I've found some awesome stuff through that.
Humans ritualize all sorts of activities, positive and negative.
Debating between going back to my bio school background via probably bioinformatics but for now really like working outside with my hands. Starting to build custom furniture and repair equipment on the side.
Cant imagine doing one type of job for more than handful of years, at least for now.
I would suppose that it went something like:
1. Person sees/experiences something interesting/abnormal/rare
2. Can't figure out how to explain what happened
3. Attributes experience to god/religion
Once we started filling in that middle bit there was less around that could only be attributed to religion so it lost a lot of its draw.
Now that we are closer to a state where we can attribute most things to nature/science/etc religion does seem to be left with mostly dogma.
A guy builds a news aggregator and shows it on HN, and you purposely click on something you know you are not interested in just to comment that you are not interested in it? Why?
Not everything is for you man.
Still a good book overall though, don't get my wrong.
For the curious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4De2tMjPRCE
"Personality tests are full of broad generalities that should be taken with a grain of salt. Instead, personality tests should be treated as tools for self-reflection. They are indicators of tendencies, not hard and fast rules."
Just a thing to help you think about yourself, not a diagnosis.
Extraversion/Introversion is pretty deeply embedded in psychological theory, even if its not easily measured directly. FWIW
Hope that still works!
What? Is there any evidence to support this statement?
I know I (personally, anecdotally) am a way calmer, more rational and reasonable decision maker after bouts of intense exercise. - Heavy lifting sessions, hard sports training, etc.