sutib

If someone manages to devise a way to prove something was written by a human they will make a lot of goola

Your comment form is broken on mobile. It asks for a captcha but doesn't prompt one

"And Icarus laughed as he fell, for he knew to fall means to once have soared"

If an AI doesnt generate perfect code, if left to its devices it will at some point create a codebase big and nasty enough that it will not be able to deal with it.

5 nines is at best a temporary achievement, given enough time.

I can see huge utility with AI as a guide and helper.

But not being one leg in the code myself is not something I am comfortable with. It starts feeling like management and not development. I really feel the abdication very strongly and it makes me unable and unwilling to put a hard stamp on quality. I have seen too much hallucination or half missed requirements to put that much trust in AI.

It's the same with code reviews of hard tickets. You can scroll past and just approve, but do you really understand what your colleague has built? Are you really in the driver's seat? It feels to me like YOLOing with major consequences.

I dont but, at all that people doing 20x output have any idea what they are coding. They are just pressing the yolo button and no one, not the engineer, not the AI and not management is in the driver's seat. it is a very scary time.

"they need the ability to transact with businesses and one another."

Really, they _need_ it. How can we possibly live without computers spending money without supervision?

The point of the article is it is not what you would've said. Even though you take responsibility for the result, you were never 100% the origin.

I had the same reflex. I just can't read AI redacted stuff. I don't know why it just reads very hollow and 'icky'