strikelaserclaw

I'm not saying people without any background or connections can't be successful. I'm saying that it is like winning a lottery to be even born to parents who even read books about how to make their kids successful. With that kind of parental dedication, i have no doubt that their kids would be successful even without reading the book above.

Lets look at the timeline :

1. Be born to a stanford physics professor and his very conscientious/intelligent wife

2. Have google start in your garage

3. Pivot and be successful

I always wonder how many people could have replicated similar successes if put in similar positions and i always feel like it is a lot. Like i can't imagine you taking someone from the same time period as newton or einstein and replacing them and seeing similar success but in a rich environment surrounded with bright people like early google, i feel like just being early to google is enough to guarantee that you'll have some good ideas. Using advertising to make money has always existed that is what tv channels and magazines did for a long time before the internet, i'm sure google would have been just as successful without google doodles or put another way - google's success allowed it to be whacky and not vice versa.

in what way though? she seemed like she was pretty much plugged into the silicon valley ecosystem from birth - her dad was a professor at Stanford, google was founded in her garage ! I willing to bet there are a lot of people in silicon valley who could have replicated her success if they'd been put in the same position.

pretty easy to raise successful children when both your parents are driven and smart and live in silicon valley when the tech boom was just starting to occur.

"You still load up the ads so the website owner gets an ad view, no harm done." - not quite, without other events like taking a user to advertisers page or linking sales to this particular ad, i think this website will have its ad revenue reduced.

if you think from the perspective of people who can't really build any wealth and are just slaving away with nothing to show for it - you can understand why they see it that way. Lets be honest, 80% of building wealth is just what time period and what country and what socioeconomic class you were born to

we need to replace humans at the helm with robots.

humans will always take the path of least resistance to spike domaine when given the option - that is why we banned drugs and most of these apps with short form info like tiktok, reels, instagram, twitter - these are pretty much like drugs. I wish i can just throw away my phone and live my life but 'being on' is just an expectation in todays world.

in east Asia, education is a commodity for material / societal success - we should not emulate them.

this makes sense as schools mostly exist just to create an educated workforce to can run the machine. Even science is big business these days, just keep cranking out papers of dubious value and reproducibility

It is not the same thing but probably related to whatever mechanism in the brain causes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-group_homogeneity - The people in a position of power regularly interact with the ceo, so they can see all the nuances that go with that but to most people at the top, "employees" is a homogenous bunch of replaceable cogs.

This phenomenon is a function of attributing all the positive developments within a company to the C-suite executives. Just as shareholders profit from the productive work of many employees, the C-suite executives often receive credit for the achievements of a large number of people. I think it is related to a fundamental characteristic of humans, that being we can't understand information unless it is calculated into simpler versions ( concepts like medians, averages, variance, "who is the best", "who is the worst", "who is the most evil", "who is the least evil" all come out of the same human need to get simplified answers). When credit and information moves up up the funnel from employees to c - suite, it gets - credit gets assigned at higher and higher levels. It is not team xyz that did it, it is their manager, or their manager's managers until it gets to the ceo who only knows that "svp x was responsible for this successful product launch" - since the people at the top determine pay scales, if theres 10-20 million to pay out in terms of increments, the board rewards the ceo with 10 million because he is apparently responsible for ALL the successful product launches, the ceo decides to reward svp with 2 million increment etc... It truly does pay to sit at the table with the decision makers.

math is just formalizing ideas into symbols and creating rules to manipulate and understand the ideas further. It is really the "ideas" that are important but all school really teaches is the manipulation aspect of it which is a bit boring without understanding the ideas. Most of early mathematical education is of the form "assume we have so and so arcane formulation - here is what we can do with it by applying these rules whose truths you just have to memorize"

i mean you are a small cog in a giant machine, what else can you expect?

because most of these companies are (run by?) sociopaths - as soon as low interest rates dried up DEI initiatives got slashed even though these companies are still making record profits.

once interests rate went up all DEI initiatives dried up - these companies don't really have integrity or beliefs beyond doing what is politically correct at the current time.

i don't think women should be discriminated against in whatever profession they want to go to if they have the ability but i also believe men and women are different in terms of interests and women and men will never reach 50-50 parity in engineering type professions.

every group tries to fight for equality and once thats achieved or close to achieved, they try to fight for an advantage, it is unfortunately rooted in the selfishness of human beings. Women seem to be attending college in greater numbers than men, soon we'll need programs to help men get a boost.

YES! Apple user base is very very valuable - in general the apple user base has money and is willing to spend it on shiny stuff

employers care about employees feelings in so far as employees being happy is actually valuable to the company. Since we are in an employer market, they will essentially do whatever they want.

it probably is a bit of a virtuous cycle but i'd argue that richer people generally demand more accountability and have more power to enact change from their local government than poor people - whether this is due to richer people being better educated, or having more free time to think about local politics, or a sense of entitlement for getting more out of society etc... i think they all play a part in being engaged in local politics and having agency to effect change.

i mean, San Mateo is like one of the richest counties in America - i'd hope they would be able to do basic things like what you stated.

if its organized like a chain, it is either a chain or intends to become one.

and why does thought have to have one form? I think in both language and visual representations and i switch between them depending on the task and i even pipe the input from one representation into the other representation.

the american system is setup to increase stock prices, whether ceos have talent or not, being in the middle of this setup can help them justify their own salaries.

the feeling that you are the "man" and will hit the jackpot with a startup is a hell of a feeling.

depends on what society you are from, in America usually people who have a lot of knowledge and are innovative and work hard can succeed. If you come from a corrupt third world country then yea, the only thing that has value is power, nepotism etc...

the salamanca family

by my estimation gpt latest is only a little better than gemini. i have no loyalty to chatgpt, i'll switch to whatever free service fits my needs.

most of these teenagers already come from upper middle class (professional parents) backgrounds, they don't need the money, they know that winning it is a guaranteed admission to MIT or Harvard. Getting admitted to top schools today is an order of magnitude tougher than it was even 10 years ago.