stbernardlove
Re:H-1B: Federal judge backs government’s narrower view of ‘specialty ...
on Friday July 19, 2019 @03:10PM (#20481582)
I'm sorry, but if you were forced to accept your initial H1B offer to immigrate to this country, then I believe there are authorities you can report this to.
However, it sounds like you came here voluntarily on an H1B and are now disappointed that you still don't have a green card, even though H1B and GC are separate things and no one ever promised you one. Nor does the US govt owes you one.
Re:H-1B: Federal judge backs government’s narrower view of ‘specialty ...
on Friday July 19, 2019 @03:06PM (#20481558)
Very simple to fix - ban H1B for contracted staff. I.e. each recipient works for his org and only for this org. None of this 3rd party placement crap.
Re:H-1B: Federal judge backs government’s narrower view of ‘specialty ...
on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:51PM (#20481444)
The parent comment was unsubstantive. It served no purpose, but to falsely paint the author as a victim. I disagree that calling someone a "drama queen" is flaming or name-calling.
Re:H-1B: Federal judge backs government’s narrower view of ‘specialty ...
on Thursday July 18, 2019 @07:06PM (#20474843)
Thank you for saying how it is and now just blaming on "racist country caps". We might abolish caps tomorrow, but you'll still be as backlogged as you were before.
Re:H-1B: Federal judge backs government’s narrower view of ‘specialty ...
on Thursday July 18, 2019 @06:58PM (#20474771)
Signed up just to say this. I don't see the controversy in not counting QA analyst as a specialty position. Just look up what countries like Canada, UK, France consider specialty positions and understand that this isn't a controversy.
In fact, I was shocked that QA has been an H1B position in the United States. This is also why there are such massive backlogs for EB-3 for India, despite them getting circa 18% of the cap (7% + unused quota from ROW).