News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

special

Re:Scramble.io: secure email for everyone on Tuesday November 05, 2013 @12:05PM (#6676243)
Wouldn't that require the user to install the browser extension to use the service? That would lock out a lot of people that would find this service useful (eg. Tails users).
Re:Scramble.io: secure email for everyone on Tuesday November 05, 2013 @11:52AM (#6676140)
It prompts you if you try to send an email to someone without using their public key. I dig it.

Edit: Also links you to xkcd if you pick a crappy password: http://i.imgur.com/TJ3QPP7.png

Re:Snapchat is Intrinsically Worthless on Monday November 04, 2013 @05:03PM (#6671506)
I thought this when I first heard of snapchat. How could you not archive away the pictures somewhere?
Oh, this is right up my street. I love the minimal UI.
Re:Does life end after 35? on Wednesday October 30, 2013 @11:33AM (#6641035)
From the title I expected a wishy-washy, pseudo-inspirational blog post and instead my entire concept of success was shaken up and realigned. Great post.
Re:Motorola's Project Ara on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @11:45AM (#6634973)

  > Sorry but no. I doubt it will ever go further 
  > than prototype and wouldn't be surprised if it 
  > never reaches working prototype stage.
People said Phonebloks would never be more than a weak concept but here we are.

  > How?
I meant that users complaining about battery life can be a considered a more general complaint about not being able to upgrade their hardware. If manufacturers start adding better batteries, users will gripe about another component. They could keep plugging leaks like that. Or they can introduce modularity and build a new dam.
Re:Motorola's Project Ara on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @10:22AM (#6634275)
>I wonder what would happen if you need a bigger "slot" for your block or if the "slot" is too big.

You swap out your camera for a 5-block expansion hub, attach your camera to that and enjoy your 4 new slots.

Re:Motorola's Project Ara on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @10:19AM (#6634252)
I'm not as interested in upgrades as I am in being able to replace failing components. It's just silly that a faulty graphics card can cripple a whole computer currently.
Re:Motorola's Project Ara on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @10:16AM (#6634233)
It might take a few attempts from a few different companies but this is the way smartphones are going to go. We've needed modularity in these tiny computers we carry around for a long time now. The cries of "more battery" for example are just a symptom of modularity deficiency. I am fully behind this project.
Re:Ask HN: Why do you upvote a submission? on Sunday October 27, 2013 @09:20PM (#6624516)
Each of my upvotes probably breaks down to:

10% - A digital thumbs-up to the author.

20% - I feel like I gained something from the article and I want to repay the author by promoting his work.

30% - I want other people to see it because the world would be better if more people knew about the subject of the article.

40% - Fulfilling a narcissistic craving to express my approval of something similar to a Facebook Like or Youtube Thumbs-Up.

It gets interesting when the link is, for example, a raffle. I want to upvote because of the first, second and last reasons but I want to downvote so that less people hear about it thus increasing my own chance of winning. Individualism vs collectivism encapsulated in a single mouse click.

I'm so pleased to see people talking about elementary OS. It's a cool project. Some links for the lurkers:

http://elementaryos.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_(operating_system)

Do you know Powershell? I admit it's not quite as good as the real thing but at least you can 'ls' on Windows.
If the text was about the issue, the method of provocation wouldn't be as effective.
I am not a scientist but I'm guessing it's not as simple as that or our methods for cooking food would have become less effective over time.
Re:CSS3 Features That You Can Finally Start Using on Sunday October 27, 2013 @12:25PM (#6622413)
What if a better-looking website convinces the other 96% of your users to spend 4% more (on average) than they otherwise would?