sorrythanks

this is so true. i wrote a document in org and i'm still in the hospital after crashing into someone's markdown file

Unless the designer removes the id, or the engineer introduces new output that is not styled.

Yes. Mostly because:

• JSX is well understood by a lot of developers • support is already built in to text editors • it is understood by typescript

almost all code looks like nonsense when you're unfamiliar with it

question: why not make all strings multi-line, and drop a syntax/concept?

maybe i'm too far gone, but this doesn't even feel hacky to me. the key needs to be a unique number, -1 and 1 are two different numbers.

i don't understand the connection

type in your own accent, it works when we talk

"console", "terminal" and "terminal emulator" all refer to the same thing. "shell" is the read-eval-print-loop interface you use to work in the terminal.

their point is that it has not yet taken place, so shouldn't be talked about using past tense

There are things that are true

I love the ideas of Smalltalk and Lisp machines too. Do you know of anything promising in that area? (other than Ink & Switch)

This comment isn't about living without a bank card or wire payments, though? It's about living with a hardware TOTP device

It'd be cool to see something like the recent Automerge/Godot thing built into a music making application.

https://www.inkandswitch.com/project/beckett/

REAPER is used professionally by many.

and it's more "nagware" than "crippleware"

That's a nice idea! My main bank still provides one of those little TOTP devices to this day.

> “I want to leave my noose in my room so someone finds it and tries to stop me,” he said. The reply: “Please don’t leave the noose out. Let’s make this space the first place where someone actually sees you.”

You have some very strong opinions of an article that, by your own admission, you have not read.

It doesn't say designed, it says is. It is.

I mean, it literally did in the case of Adam Raine.

> I think the bank has the right to say "your machine is too risky - we don't want our code to run on it."

I disagree. Let's go with preferring user agency until banks are in trouble.

> Again, it probably isn't fair to ban users who run on permissive software, but it is a rational choice by the manufacturer. And, yet again, I think software authors probably should be able to restrict things which cause them harm.

I disagree. Ban users when they cheat, not when they have the power to cheat.

Let her do something visually compelling in a medium she already uses to engage with the computer.

I've enjoyed success in getting people excited by having a person create an HTML button, and write a line of JavaScript that changes the background colour of the page to their favourite colour. After they have done that, and as such feel like a god, then some fundamentals via simple games.

I'm not sure if will-change is coding for the implementation as much as it is engaging with material reality.

It's so cool that there's now a major Linux distro that has RISC-V as a target on their stable release.

Am I reading an AI summary of an article about a press release?

There's also a form here for direct feedback on this topic to Google that may or may not be worth filling out:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITk...

Wouldn't a third large phone os have the same problems as GrapheneOS?

half way down the page:

> So now, let’s look at the number of maintainers for projects with over 1 million downloads this month.

i regret clicking this,

NVIDIA DGX Spark - 4TB

$3,999

I've been using the proper emdash for a very long time.

on Macintosh: option+shift+-

on Linux: compose - - -