News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

sokrates85

Re:Wolfram Rule 30 Prizes on Wednesday October 02, 2019 @02:25AM (#21133836)
He made the claims but not sure if that paper ever appeared.
I agree that the integer factorization is a poor choice. Last statement in the Abstract talks about sampling and optimization which could be the bigger point.

Their pre-processing seems like simply expanding out their cost function that's of the form E= (F - XY)^2. Of course it's a lot of multiplications since X and Y are binary and multi-dimensional. Not sure if it would be NP-hard though.

x = rand() % 2 always gives a random number. You can't correlate them that way.

Needs to be a tunable random number and technically needs to be "true" as mentioned.

But I don't think that the authors would disagree with your larger point - their point is to provide polynomial speed-up over digital computers for a certain class of problems. That this can be done with classical computers isn't exactly a deep insight, it's rather obvious.