News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

snoozing

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @01:30PM (#33683715)
I don’t know that it’s just patience wearing thin.

There’s a lot of fearmongering on both sides. I think people already come to the table really amped up quick to throw stones.

Hear, hear on the forums part, though.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @10:11AM (#33681464)
Fair enough.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:23AM (#33679047)
>but I have something against small group of people imposing on the whole society how we can use word women in context of pregnancy, especially in a world in which only biological woman can give birth to a child.

This. There’s a difference between asking for respect (I’ll use the name you want) versus fighting to call breastfeeding chest feeding.

Seriously, the world has bigger problems than to debate over language.

If the general public cared half as much about world hunger (or child hunger!) as it did about debating the definition about the word “women” the world would be a better place.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:17AM (#33679019)
Of course they are important.

But do they hold more weight to rename how the 99.9% of the population is referred to?

it’s the latter that frustrates people IMO. I think if people focused on simple acceptance of themselves instead of trying to rewrite the social fabric, it would help.

Also, even though Hydrogen and Helium are by far the most common elements, oxygen is still a different element.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:15AM (#33679011)
0.13% -> 1% doesn’t feel like rounding (it’s actually nearly a 10x change). 0.13 is not a large fraction.

Assuming good intentions based on your other comments, but these things can elicit negative responses.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:13AM (#33679003)
If women don’t agree with being a large part of their identity being renamed, then it doesn’t feel inclusive.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:09AM (#33678984)
>There are lots of kids born with ambiguous & differing genitals where parents & doctors make an assignment for that kid outside the womb.

I don’t think most people would argue against medically intersex people identifying outside of traditional norms, which I would imagine is a small subset of people identifying as trans.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature on Sunday November 20, 2022 @01:37AM (#33678861)
I think you’ve communicated your beliefs and experiences clearly and respectfully.

You ask questions rather than name call and finger point.

While I personally struggle with these new definitions and their potential cost to certain groups (someone pregnant like the post’s author), I feel like I can actually discuss and learn something new, and feel heard myself.

We need more activists like you.