smus

What do you mean World Cup debut? haven't they won 5?

What source can you possibly be looking for lmao

Iphones are created by low wage workers with poor working conditions

You think a motorcycle will do serious damage to a car driver when rear ending?

Can you explain how CoT is a form of diffusion or models bidirectional attn?

Many people have places to live without owning a house. Me for example!

Is there anything you do that ends up being more dangerous? Genuinely curious

Are you implying frontier models are running on a100s? Certainly not

We benchmarked Gemini 2.5 on 100 open source object detection datasets in our paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20612 (see table 2)

Notably, performance on out of distribution data like those in RF100VL is super degraded

It worked really well zero-shot (comparatively to the foundation model field) achieving 13.3 average mAP, but counterintuitively performance degraded when provided visual examples to ground its detections from, and when provided textual instructions on how to find objects as additional context. So it seems it has some amount of object detection zero-shot training, probably on a few standard datasets, but isn't smart enough to incorporate additional context or its general world knowledge into those detection abilities

You are still being incredibly reductionist but just going into more detail about the system you are reducing. If I stayed at the same level of abstraction as "a brain is just proteins and current" and just described how a single neuron firing worked, I could make it sound equally ridiculous that a human brain might be conscious.

Here's a question for you: how do you reconcile that these stochastic mapping are starting to realize and comment on the fact that tests are being performed on them when processing data?

The point is this is a problem you have on ARM. Your choices are select ARM, have this problem, or didn't select ARM and don't have this problem.

You understand that factoid strengthens the point of the person you're replying to right

The comment I replied to conceded wrongness and smugness but is still somehow confused why otherwise intelligent ppl dislike the movement. I was hoping to clear it up for them

Extra points for that comment's author implying that people who don't like the wrong and smug movement are unintelligent and protecting their egos, thus personally proving its smugness

Feels like "they are wrong and smug" is enough reason to dislike the movement

Even in cities with good public transit, it will not take me home at 3 AM, with possibly few exceptions like cities that have good public transit.

What's your Venmo?

Nope, they all depend on x and the same is true in this scenario

You are super confident a thing that exists can't exist

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_well_(condenser)

Check out the passive section of the above

60bpm of random notes!

Have you been to San Francisco?

It's a bit demoralizing people talk about AI training as if it were even 1/100th the environmental impact of the personal automobile or frequent airplane trips

What school you attend super measurably affects future earnings

I wouldn't say you taught the ai anything so much as wired some API calls together

Nintendo sent cease and desists to streamed super smash Brothers melee tournaments during covid. Buncha free advertising to their IP by a group of their most passionate fans

Convolutional neural networks are pretty big

So many straws were grasped at in the making of this article

Smushi come home if the most similar I've played

You seem like a joy

Yes, it's phd students there's an oversupply of, not mediocre web devs at ad companies

Alphafold doesn't exist