smellf

Ubuntu's release numbers are not semver, they're year and month. 22.04 is the April release from 2022. Your LT is redundant, all 04 releases from even-numbered years are LTS. And people do frequently refer to Ubuntu releases by the code name, though usually just the adjective and not the animal - jammy, noble, etc.

So what you're saying is, "Python tooling isn't bad because I understand all the quirks"

I've had the exact same experience. In the before-time I often reflected on how my love of sqlite was borderline irrational for what it is. Now, in a few projects I've let the LLM do postgres, and it's so nice having the pain if a db server mostly just handled. Still choose sqlite for anything embedded or without a hosted server.

Srchr

I wonder how they can reconcile the stricter proposals with the LLM usage in kernel development. That seems totally untenable. I mean it all seems untenable, but with the kernel especially.

Also, what about when you inevitably get a situation where a critical vulnerability is discovered, and the only patch available is LLM generated? Do they have to wait to patch until some person who hasn't seen the LLM-generated patch does a clean room implementation?

I understand the objections to LLMs, but rejecting LLM-generated code really doesn't seem realistic.

You can have my `easy_install` when you pry it from my cold dead fingers.

The "G" in AGI stands for "general", so talking about "AGI for software development" makes no sense, and worse than that accepts the AI companies' goalpost-shifting at face value. We shouldn't do that.

Isn't that kind of like saying my pressure washer is a non-ambulatory car?

Antichamber: https://store.steampowered.com/app/219890/Antichamber/

Also look at myhouse.wad for actual Doom in actual non-Euclidean spaces.

Don't know how it compares to other manufacturers, but I've been pretty happy with the minimal BS that comes on my last two Sony phones.

I think the idea is that you'd have two independently-develooed systems, one LLM decompiling the binary and the other LLM formally verifying. If the verifier disagrees with the decompiler you won't know which tool is right and which is wrong, but if they agree then you'll know the decompiled result is correct, since both tools are unlikely to hallucinate the same thing.

> RK3588-based SBC

Anyone know which SBCs use this chip?

Nor even the comment they were replying to, lol.

Examples: https://research.myshell.ai/open-voice

Seems impressive!

24 * 365 times

Even if they were you still wouldn't hyphenate there.

Seconding TVR Exploring! His videos are a breath of fresh air in today's clickbaity youtube landscape. He's easily the best abandoned mine exploration channel - I can hardly even watch any of the others any more.

Actually it turns out that, at least in debian 11, you were right on the money:

    cat `which egrep`
    #!/bin/sh
    exec grep -E "$@"

But I agree that it would be cleaner and trivial to implement this behavior by depending on argv[0], GNU style guide be damned.

From their webpage:

  Chrome: behind a flag since version 91.0.4470.0
  Firefox: behind a flag since version 90.0a1
  Edge: behind a flag since version 91
  Opera: behind a flag since version 77
  ImageMagick: since version 7.0.10-54
  XnView MP: since version 0.97.0
  ImageGlass: since version 8.1.4.18
  ExifTool: since version 12.23
  gThumb: since version 3.11.3
  OpenMandriva Lx: since version 4.3 RC
  GIMP: since version 2.99.8
  qimgv: since version 1.0.0
  PhotoQt: since version 2.4
  jxl-winthumb: with WIC-codec since version 0.1.11
  KImageFormats: since version 5.89.0

They still do, and the quality of discourse on Slashdot is about as bad as it has ever been.

Agreed! I love bash and use it all the time, but if some solution gets to the point of needing actual data structures, that's when you know it's time to move to a real programming language.

I don't understand - every set listed on that page has a nonzero score for "Smart Features".

I looked around a bit and couldn't find Dall-e in there. A higher post in this thread said they don't usually release their models. It's a shame, this would have been fun to play with.

Edit: I was wrong, never mind.

How is Stallman a redirect to RMS's page? Shouldn't it go to a disambiguation or name page?

The date is repeated below, so that's not a typo. He then talks about how Compuserve has been using PDP-10s for the previous 17 years. Compuserve was around in 1971??

Edit: Holy shit, Compuserve was founded in 1969(!) as a subsidiary of an insurance company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompuServe

What he's referring to is not leaves on the ground, but upturned leaves on the trees. The conventional wisdom says that a storm is coming when you can see the backs of the leaves.

Yeah, and that guy is actually still active on HN and is always decent whenever someone calls him out about his ancient Dropbox comment.

> Jameson is better than Johnie Walker Black

Obviously this is subjective, but I disagree so completely I can't even imagine how anyone could think this.