simunaga

why are disappointed? if everyone had certificates, how much valuable would they be for employers? it's odd. just think about it for a minute.

Android 6 will allow to block the permissions of an app, right?

maybe you know.

can I and how obtain this information myself, from the very source, for a given domain name or company or whatever it is?

ipinfo.io retrieves this information from somewhere. can I and how obtain this information myself, from the very source?

what's AS number? how can I find out what a AS number for a domain or ip address is?

call it competition then. it'll become higher and salaries are lower.

and? higher supply cases less demand. it's as simple as 2+2.

problem for whom? how's that a problem that people is asia now are able to earn money?

Interesting. The situation when robots not only take the people jobs but because of the robots new jobs get created, comes to mind. Isn't it similar to that?

Yet, I think that robots don't create as many jobs as they take.

yes, could be. but not necessarily will be and not necessarily that you and other people of the middle or low class will be given a luxury to have a robot and not to work.

maybe low and middle class will have to serve people from high class who will have robots.

transition to what? are you sure you and other programmers will be better off with that transition?

if jobs should be lost, I suggest you to leave you current job. and I'll want to see where you're going to get money to buy food.

Why be optimistic at all? The more people are able to code, the less demand for it, the less salaries of the programmers.

In what sense in this a great news? Yes, it's a progress, so what? After all, you - programmers - earn money for your jobs and pretty soon you might not have one. Because of these kinds of great news -- "Whayyy, this is really interesting, AI, maching learning. Aaaaa!".

"I'll get fired, won't have money for living and AI will take my place, but the world will be better! Yes! Progress!"

Who will benefit from this? Surely not you. Why are you so ecstatic then?

My comment isn't about gender. It's about the fact that the same lawyer can prove that you, whether you be a man or woman, victim or criminal, guilty and non-guilty at the same time. Depending on whose side the lawyer is.

A woman's or a man's lawyer?

While in general it can be true, it's not necessarily the case that everything in the article is 100% true. We don't know all the details.