shpeedy

Just throw more scientists at the problem.

For billionaire, wish list will have this top item:

1. Kill solarmist (it's good starting point).

5x is order of magnitude larger. Quote:

Generally, the order of magnitude of a number is the smallest power of 10 used to represent that number.[2] To work out the order of magnitude of a number N, the number is first expressed in the following form:

    N = a × 10^b

where 1/sqrt(10) ≤ a < sqrt(10) . Then, b represents the order of magnitude of the number.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_magnitude

You are joking about "small numbers of deaths", right?, because this millennia is not over yet.

IMHO, you should replace RF with Turkey. RF was unable to grab Ukraine or Georgia, which were completely unprepared to war.

Yep, but you have bug in your awk one-liner.

Perl is much faster[0], with much more features, with bunch of ready to use libraries, with package manager (CPAN), and similar syntax to awk.

Why you use awk?

[0]: http://rc3.org/2014/08/28/surprisingly-perl-outperforms-sed-...

Skip learning of sed and awk and jump straight to perl instead.

  $ perl --help
  ...
  -F/pattern/       split() pattern for -a switch (//'s are optional)
  -l[octal]         enable line ending processing, specifies line terminator
  -a                autosplit mode with -n or -p (splits $_ into @F)

  -n                assume "while (<>) { ... }" loop around program
  -p                assume loop like -n but print line also, like sed
  -e program        one line of program (several -e's allowed, omit programfile)

Example. List file name and size:

  ls -l | perl -ae 'print "@F[8..$#F], $F[4]"'

They only way to get rid of mines is to make them useless. Robots can make them useless, because they can spot and disarm or label mines automatically, or just step on them.

It's not true.

Mines are simple robots. They kill for decades after a war. Killer tank robot is much less dangerous.

It's result of frequent shadowban without reason.

It was that way from very beginning. It's Artificial _Intelligence_ , not an Artificial Human.

Previously, Firefox was fine on computer with 2GB of memory and hundreds of tabs. Now, 8GB is not enough.

Firefox eats memory. 4GB of memory is barely enough to run browser and show few tabs.

Yep. Pilot Wave theory is underdeveloped theory, but it helps to develop intuition. Walking droplets are even better for that. IMHO, it's better to use QM to solve QM problems in science, but use walking droplets and Pilot Wave Theory to develop intuition for others. Walking droplets are easy to demonstrate. Double slit experiment can be reproduced in school lab. This way, quantum physics can be taught in school for children of age 12+, so they will be ready to solve much more complex problems when they will be PhD.

Entanglement is hard problem for PWT. Photos of entangled photons[0] are intriguing, because they look similar to behavior of walking droplets in some experiments (see dotwave.org feed). I hope, someone will be able to reproduce entanglement in macro. Currently, my top priority is to reproduce Stern–Gerlach experiment in macro (I suspect that interference between external field and particle wave creates channel, which guides particle into spot, but it better to see it once). Second priority is creation of "photons" in macro. Entanglement will be third. IMHO, all of them require microgravity to reproduce in 3D.

[0]: https://phys.org/news/2019-07-scientists-unveil-first-ever-i...

We have no perfect theory to explain everything, so it's just tradeoff, exchange of one set of inconsistencies for another set of inconsistencies, but with better intuition. I'm doing it here, in my country.

The problem with current theories is that I understand them when I reading them. It's like piece of complex code or book with complex but boring text, like phonebook. I can follow it, when I read it, but I cannot reproduce it when book is closed.

Can we teach a phonebook to kids? Yep. Is it useful? Nope.

Recently, I did "quantum physics in one picture" experiment. Results are very good: lots of reposts, comments, interest in topic.

No, it's like saying that nature is built on kind of vertex buffer, because OpenGL accurately predicts reality.

Field is mathematical abstraction, used in mathematical model, to represent a physical thing.

Physical things are real. Mathematical abstractions are not. OpenGL is not real too, but it looks very real and accurately predicts reality. In OpenGL, field is array, e.g. "float[][][] field;".

I feel also air field (wind), height field (land), light field (photons), and so on.

So, EM field describes strength of EM force in every point of mathematical model. Nature of EM force is unknown. Right?

Let's talk about nature of EM force.

Analogy: look at a typical tropical cyclone. It rotates. Is it rotating because a unknown property of an air molecule? No. It rotates because our planet rotates, while air molecules are just trying to keep their positions. I.e. it's rotation of planet + inertia of molecules.

Is it possible that EM force is happens because our local space is moving trough global space by non-linear trajectory, so it just non-linear trajectory of local space + inertia of rotating and vibrating particles?