News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

shivam543

Isn't it possible to eject the fuel / fuel tank if crash is imminent?
For 2 x 3200 MHz, 51.2 GB/s is the theoretical limit. I guess your single core is good enough to use all bandwidth. How many RAM sticks do you have?
I changed data_volume to 8GB and ran on my 4 year old laptop (Amd Ryzen 4800H + 2 x 8GB 3200MHz DDR4 running NixOS with Linux 6.1.71) I get around 36 GB/s

  1 20.9 
  2 33.4 
  3 35.7 
  4 36.2 
  5 35.2 
  6 35.4 
  7 34.7 
  8 34.9 
  9 34.0 
  10 34.2 
  11 34.4 
  12 34.3 
  13 33.8 
  14 33.6 
  15 33.4 
  16 32.9
 
I expected 51.2 GB/s (2 x 3200 x 1e6 Transfers/s of 8 bytes each)
Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design on Friday August 18, 2023 @01:38AM (#37171699)
s/w stack penalizes IPv4 by 25 ms to 300 ms. This is not a point to say that v4 is bad, but has been made bad artificially: https://ma.ttias.be/apple-favours-ipv6-gives-ipv4-a-25ms-pen...
Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design on Monday August 14, 2023 @03:11PM (#37125430)
I did a small experiment with 2 websites: federalreserve.gov and one of the Google's server located in Delhi. I'm in India in a city around 250 kms from Delhi on ISP: Reliance Jio Fiber. I see around 8ms benefit when using IPv6 for Google, and 20 ms when using federalreserve.gov Hardly noticable
Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design on Monday August 14, 2023 @08:43AM (#37120383)
> And until we can start disabling v4, v6 gives no advantage and only causes significant added complexity.

v6 advantages:

* If you're an ISP, you need more complex hardware for CGNAT-v4 if your traffic is huge. If you do support v6, netflix, youtube and majority of your traffic is already on v6, you can get by without upgrading your CGNAT Infra.

* I suspect v6 should have faster initial connection - time to first byte, because of no NAT. I assume NAT is implied in v4 because if you're an ISP say in India where you have 1.2B mobile devices, you cannot buy 1/4th of all IPv4 addresses.

* Because of more IP addresses you can run VMs with public v6 addresses. It's not common to have ISPs give multiple IPv4 to a single customer, but with v6 that's always the case.

If I run ntfy behind NGINX reverse proxy which is on https, isn't that E2E encrypted due to https?
You can self-host nextcloud and try phonetrack app. https://apps.nextcloud.com/apps/phonetrack