News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

sgraham

Re:PreZentit, Our Startup (Online PreZentations). Asking for feedback. on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @01:21AM (#56728)
Clicking on the thumbnail should start the show.
Re:PreZentit, Our Startup (Online PreZentations). Asking for feedback. on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @01:20AM (#56727)
Looks pretty slick.

I really, really dislike clicking on the try-it link and getting a fullscreen-ish popup. Someone, somewhere that knows something about design must have a list that includes "Don't change my window size, unless you're a musician."

Re:Finally, a video of what Xobni actually does on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @01:11AM (#56722)
Um, meh? I don't see much past gmail's sidebar reimplemented in outlook, but otoh, that seems like it could be a decent niche. Perhaps most surprising is that I've actually heard about them, which is an impressive marketing push.

I don't like the logo/pronunciation, the bar over the "o" implies "xohbni" (a long "o"), but whatever I guess.

Re:Try out Pod Clod. It's a game I made. Do you find it addicting? on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @01:02AM (#56720)
Aiming is too irritating to fine tune.

Don't use 0xff0000 and 0x00ff00, they're painfully programmer-y.

Re:What RSS reader do you use? on Monday September 10, 2007 @08:36PM (#53057)
Feedreader on PC, only because some of my feeds require passwords, and online ones don't seem to support that too well. Used to be bloglines before that requirement.
Re:Apple now considering bidding in the wireless auction on Monday September 10, 2007 @02:24PM (#52875)
Is a joint goog/aapl bid unlikely? Or am I reading too much into gmaps on iphone?
Also, the Starcraft CPU player doesn't cheat.
Re:Can Lisp do What Perl Does Easily? on Friday September 07, 2007 @01:21AM (#51525)
The only concrete assertions I see there are that regular expressions are error-prone (fine, if you really think so, don't use them), and that data in Perl aren't s-expressions (I'm assuming that's what he's ranting about when he's implying that all Perl is good for is massaging input formats).

So pretty weak: CPAN is the supreme, far-and-away, no-other-reason-or-language-comes-close (at least in 2000) to use Perl.

This is exactly what I was thinking when I read the article about naming phones with cryptic numbers earlier. Random strings of vowels in non-words are just as memorable as KR344-a I'd say.

Hmm, maybe I should register kr344-a.com just to be safe though.

Re:We are living in someone else's computer simulation on Wednesday August 15, 2007 @07:03AM (#42609)
The "20%" hunch kind of made skim from then on, but:

What's the definition of computer, exactly? Even without any magical circular reasoning, the computer built on atoms and physics that we're being simulated in is just as deterministic as the computer I'm using, so I'm not sure I even see a difference.

Re:We are living in someone else's computer simulation on Wednesday August 15, 2007 @07:01AM (#42608)
It turns out to be a pretty long story... :)
I see no way to vote. (FF2)