sergioocon
For instance, deploying content systems inside the network would reduce bottlenecks and improve latency, and you don't need to mess with the rest of the traffic to do so. Net neutrality is there because we don't want telcos to differentiate traffic based on their value, but based on value for the customer, and that changes faster than commercial agreements.
However, that means changing business models and creating value for users and content creators, unless today, not only providing the network, but a real service on top.
With the end of net neutrality, small companies (that can start without that close to the home content distribution up to a certain traffic), would not be able to compete with the established ones, so innovation will be hindered (unless we all want faster horses)
No major problems, just minor policy changes needed that the helper was already suggesting and that were easily fixed.
With the only exception that SELinux does not like my iPhone.
Thanks!
Thanks!
And then I heard from some start-up about another: - What are they offering?, they don't even have IP. Nobody is going to buy them...
I got to the conclusion that they are more than any other thing a way to demonstrate value for small companies and a tool for big companies to delay competition from new entrants. I haven't understood yet how patent offices take care of the prior art...
Time to open a new account?