seki285

It's literally just that.

As long as I receive my paycheck I don't care, be passive aggressive to me as much as you want!

Cars are not a black box goop of matrices, this comparison is bad. You also should not compare LLMs to going from assembly to high-level.

I would never want to visit India lol

No, the problem is foreign companies. Foreign nations have interests and as a US citizen I want to only trust other US citizens with my security, so should any other citizen anywhere else e.g. India can rely on India.

You voted for this.

I guess we know how that went LOL

Why does my browser lag scrolling a text article... awful.

If they build mine-laying boats and their own missiles, yes.

Any reason to be still using HTTP/1 in 2026?

People just forget consequences for your actions exist lol, hilarious to see and kinda sad

You're racist if you don't let us drive your wages down.

They can help their own country with their talent, we don't "need" it to live.

LOL no, I sort by date for this reason and have trusted sources. I can't imagine being new to the internet in 2026 though.

This is impressive, because I had no idea and now I feel angry at having my time wasted! If this type of stuff increases in frequency and I can't easily tell if an article is AI or not, I will stop reading them.

Nothing will happen.

>How are you measuring complexity here?

In terms of how it functions, because no matter how much data you feed an LLM it's still predicting tokens. That makes it incapable of any thought.

>Your average llm is trained on a corpus that vastly exceeds the amount of data I could read in my lifetime.

But that doesn't mean they are useless, they are good at consuming large amounts of data and collating it.

I don't know how correct I am but that's my understanding and it won't change, I feel pretty confident in my simplified view of things because the basics are still there.

Okay, please educate me on this progress and how LLMs are different to generating the next most statistically probable token.

"AI" is a token generator, it does not think while the human brain is a lot more complex with a lot more sensory inputs.

I hate bots so I won't.

That's a valid assessment, and a reminder why I keep using 4chan despite how awful it is.

Tried it in a incognito tab with ChatGPT and "H. W. BASIC" did not work while "BASIC" had it explain the history and show an example of Hello World

I think that's half true because there is a lot of great technology that exists today where you can get anything done without any of the boilerplate. A very brief example is the .NET ecosystem where I get a lot of work done in asp.net and winforms in a pleasant way.

I would hate that.

Open borders!

I'm not reading any slop, period.

>I wonder how long the legacy ‘human-oriented’ layer in the middle, and the industry that's been built on top of it, will last.

Never because a lot of software is written for the human to use.

Cool, very clever. But at least the compiler warns me of a potential exception, whereas in Go no such op even exists.

I'd rather we try than give up and make a deal with the enemy.

No idea why you're getting downvoted for true statement. Without a ? like in C# you're always at risk of a nil pointer being dereferenced