sd34
Re:Why I'm Productive in Clojure (2013)
on Sunday October 22, 2017 @12:49PM (#15527666)
If a dev is dumb enough to advocate clojure, I'd be pretty suspect about their coding ability in general. I have yet to work with a decent programmer who liked it.
Re:Why I'm Productive in Clojure (2013)
on Sunday October 22, 2017 @07:27AM (#15526253)
And in Scala:
if(foo > bar && bar > boo) doSomething(a, b, c)
else doSomethingElse(d, e, f)
> Yet, if you weren't sure, you'd have to take a short break and go look that up to be certain.If you don't know how logic works then why programming? Also, this is not a "complex rule", this is just BASIC LOGIC. As obvious as it can be: read it aloud and you have it.
Also, what would this even mean:
(> foo bar boo)
THIS is what we need to check out because it's everything but obvious.> So the parenthesis might seem cumbersome at first, but they quickly make syntax quite a lot simpler.
It won't, it'll just make the code monoton and harder to look at.